Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Califreak

Debasing and mocking what God has created right before our eyes.

Causing division and confusion between the two sexes to subvert the natural continuation of the human race.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

BELOW, MY LONG RESPONSE IS SOCIAL OBSERVATION RE TRANSGENDERING OF OUR SOCIETY.

Yes. The male icons we now are shown are not like the “real men” we grew up with. Granted the “real men” were exaggerated images but we could lat least recognize the behavior and mannerisms in our own fathers, brothers. There are healthy improvements (e.g., men don’t’ have to die of heart attacks or suicide because they “can’t have feelings” or get help etc.) But there is a social neutering that seems to make men ill at ease, and confuses women.

I noticed that modern male “hunks” shown in ads, sports, movies rarely appeal the same way, but I dismissed it because I’m older and “behind the times”. Now “Men” are increasingly portrayed as inherently docile when the effects of testosterone are well known. Many male icons are now “prettier” and more “enlightened” (lack many masculine mannerisms and foibles). The videos I watched all stressed that the NWO doesn’t elevate contenders for stardom unless they embody the newer, softer “male” ideal.

Famous transgender “men” are very hard for me to perceive as genetically women - but there was an interesting video (most of the videos I trained on have been deleted) that focused on the expression in the eyes. Never noticed it before I watched those videos, but there is often an ornamental, “pretty” quality and a diffusely softer, embracing eye contact in women.

In contrast, there is a directness in the eyes of genetic males compared with a generally softer indirectness in the expression of the eyes of women. Maybe others notice that, but I had to study it to see it at all. I read a comment about the statue of David; it said that David has a ‘direct masculine gaze of determination’ and I think that’s what I now can perceive in some transgender icons.

I adapt my expectations more than others in my social circle (their personalities, quirks, appearance, beliefs, mannerisms) and I do it without noticing, so it was hard for me to try to gauge the shift in our modern day icons; I only knew “men” didn’t interest me.

Oddly enough, an outwardly straight acting gay male friend/coworker of mine saw a video of himself recently and “worried” that to him, his mannerism were becoming more noticeably “gay” (he gave an example of the movement of his hand/arm). He asked me if I noticed that change over the course of the 3 years we’d known each other. I explained that I wouldn’t have noticed the subtle drift he was talking about and that overall, I probably just found him “easier to talk to.” I didn’t have a “set point” past which he could not move his arm or tilt his head. The same has been true for me of our social drift - I don’t object to others’ gradual behavior shifts.

There’s directness of gaze in “women” icons that looks very intense and I think men respond to that because they are mistakenly perceiving the desire driven by testosterone. There is a seeking, acquisitiveness not often found in genetic women, and men therefore are more attracted as they believe this lovely “women” is seeking to acquire him sexually. Women notice male attraction to these “strong women”. This eye contact that “women” have drives fashion/makeup trends and social expectations that women will be inherently as direct, demanding, sexually aggressive etc.

I think that strangely, much of the “women’s rights” movement may have been lead by trans NWO types who, though male, found women’s roles unbearable and demanded the right to be at the head of the table at board meetings. I know that I benefit from many freedoms women didn’t have in the past (right to vote, drive a car etc) - I’m just talking about the exaggerated social expectation that women act MUCH more like men or suffer the epithets directed at men who are despised by other men, “weak”, “gutless”, apathetic”.

I like sci-fi and years ago began watch a remake of Battle Star Galactica. While I thought it odd that one of the originally male characters (fighter pilot) was going to be portrayed as a female, I still wanted to watch. But they took that character to masculine extremes. I stopped watching when they had her fist fight her male counterpart. It wasn’t just that she was a fraction of his weight but repeatedly sent him across the room with a mighty punches, it was also that she had a desire to hit someone, one that she supposedly cared for, to “make her point” and “settle a score” etc. The series portrayed them as two warring males, one of whom weighed 100lbs, who appeared to be hitting each other to establish dominance and respect which I couldn’t comprehend (I wondered if my age was showing). I found it painful and sad to watch that episode when I was supposed to find it “exciting”. I don’t own a television and rarely watch anything modern online/movies.

Many modern women believe that men/women have identical needs for respect and achievement (identical and not similar) and surprisingly, young women actually believe that the physical disparity in size and strength between women and men is not a factor when judging which of them will triumph in hand to hand combat. Instead, (too) many believe a difference in resolution to win/survive determines the outcome which I believe is a social construct common to men (e.g., pre Captain America “treatment” the scrawny man will physically fight a much larger man despite inury, saying only, “I could do this all day.)

Ironically, this element of social program distorts the area in which women and men can be similar (e.g., fight to the death for their children, give up everything for God etc.)

There was a news story of a woman who fought a mountain lion barehanded to save her children, one of whom was seriously injured. She was barely breathing when she was found bleeding out. When roused her only question before dying was “Are my children alive?” But the NWO social agenda would have us believe that she lived her life with inherently masculine personality traits, mannerisms aspirations AND physical capacity which allowed her to save her children.

This is the social side of the Satanic doctrine of opposites. Looking back at old black and white pictures of European royalty and American socialites (and wives of presidents), it’s absurdly obvious that plenty of the “women” didn’t look like women. Large brawny men stooping in heeled shoes, clutching a hand bag in that strange way men in drag effect (primly between thumb and forefinger in front of their navel). History, before The Great Awakening.


1,052 posted on 02/20/2020 2:13:51 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1041 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

enlightening. thanx


1,060 posted on 02/20/2020 2:42:16 PM PST by thinden (How many Barr haters across America are being paid by Soros to attack Barr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1052 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote
There’s directness of gaze in “women” icons that looks very intense and I think men respond to that because they are mistakenly perceiving the desire driven by testosterone. There is a seeking, acquisitiveness not often found in genetic women, and men therefore are more attracted as they believe this lovely “women” is seeking to acquire him sexually.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Not what I find attractive.

The Dao Te Jing (which I do NOT find incompatible with my Christianity) describes the true power of women best, I think, in comparing it to the ocean which receives and absorbs the waters of a mighty river (the male or yang principle).

Which is more powerful, the raging river which fills the ocean, or the ocean into which it ultimately loses itself?

Yin and yang are different yet inseparable.

Anyway, I do not prefer (in terms of attraction) women who mimic the masculine.

1,075 posted on 02/20/2020 3:29:46 PM PST by Disestablishmentarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1052 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Responding to your long post on the transgenderism...

~~~~~~~~~~~~

Once you see it, you can’t unsee it. It almost jumps out at you.

I’d like to add that fashion seems to be geared toward transgender people. Normal people have a hard time finding clothing that fits well from what I’ve read here and there.

I’m liking makeup less and less now because what’s “fashionable” now is really heavy makeup with thick, artificial looking eyebrows.

To me, it doesn’t look attractive, it looks like drag makeup. It’s bad enough on a young person but I’m in my fifties and IMO, the older you get, the worse gobs of makeup look on you.

I wear just enough pink lipstick, hint of eyeliner and mascara, and foundation to look like I didn’t just crawl out of bed if I have to go out. Back in the day, I used to wear eyeshadow, blush and the whole nine.

When I’m at home it’s usually just powder and a little bit of cover stick on booboos with bronzing cream in the summer.


1,108 posted on 02/20/2020 4:27:18 PM PST by Califreak (If Obama had been treated like Trump the US would have been burnt down before Inauguration Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1052 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

marking


1,136 posted on 02/20/2020 5:35:48 PM PST by A virtuous woman (I'm praying for my country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1052 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote
***plenty of the “women” didn’t look like women. Large brawny men stooping in heeled shoes, clutching a hand bag in that strange way men in drag effect (primly between thumb and forefinger in front of their navel)***

Spend more time at home... do a little baking. ;^)

1,207 posted on 02/20/2020 7:45:07 PM PST by Bob Ireland (The Democrap Party is the enemy of freedom.They use all the seductions and deceits of the Bolshevics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1052 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson