Posted on 02/15/2020 1:23:28 PM PST by Sam Gamgee
I will admit I like to go to Christian Post and some news sites via Facebook and I connect to friends and family there. I have to question their claim in Community of Standards.
"The goal of our Community Standards has always been to create a place for expression and give people a voice. This has not and will not change. Building community and bringing the world closer together depends on people’s ability to share diverse views, experiences, ideas and information. "
What a joke. Every time I discuss sodomy I end up suspended. I know the obvious response is to not discuss sodomy. But it that really what Facebook has gone to? First time I used the term tranny and got a 3 day ban. This time I said sodomites are notorious child molesters. Within a minute I got a 7 day ban. Can you not discuss sodomy on a Christian group?
The other thing is facebook encourages narcs. How petty and thin skinned do you have to be to go running to facebook to fight your battles for you? Makes me now get angry at my kids when they narc on each other.
They have a whole section that do not tolerate death threats and will sometimes call the police. THAT I know to be a bald face lie. A former muslim runs a group on facebook and he forwards his death threats to Facebook and they laughingly tell him they don't violate standards.
Zucker is such a lying sack of shite.
There are quite a few people who take the position that since these companies are "private", it's okay for them to censor speech. I keep telling people that if "private" owned companies that control huge amounts of public communications are allowed to censor speech, then governments will exert back door pressure to force them to censor speech which these governments don't approve.
China already does this with google. Google does whatever the Chinese government tells it to do. We also know that if someone like Obama was in power here, they would use the power of the Federal government to force large carriers of mass communications to censor speech they didn't like.
We need to put a stop to allowing anyone who carries large quantities of public speech to engage in censorship. They need to be given the choice, "Either carry it all, or you will not be allowed to operate in this nation."
Seems that they would be within their rights to censor explicit content.
There is an inequality of speech. These mass communications systems are the only effective means for speaking to large audiences for some people.
It is not only unfair that the left can use them and people on our side cannot, it is also immensely dangerous.
There are thousands of places on the internet he can go to discuss sodomy to his heart's content.
That will reach similar quantities of audience? Then it isn't the same, is it?
What you propose is very much like this.
What do you mean by “discussing” sodomy?
Did you define what it is, then say it’s unnatural, anti-reproductive, & causes physical injury & disease?
IOW, did you state facts?
That’s not allowed, ya know.
Yes, but facebook currently enjoys legal protection from content based lawsuits because they claim they do not exercise editorial control.
They either have to stop editing based on political opinion OR give up the legal protection and be treated like a newspaper, or Verizon. What they are doing is like Verizon cancelling your service if you call the Trump campaign number.
I guess I can’t claim trannys are freaks or that sodomites are child milestones
Not if someone reports you
That precisely is my problem I guess
Sad that so many are fooled by their claim at neutrality and free speech
Both
“This time I said sodomites are notorious child molesters.”
Well, that’s going a little beyond just a normal discussion. Comments like those probably violate some rule they have regarding “hate speech” or whatever they choose to call it. Of course, those policies are never enforced against leftists and are often interpreted broadly when it comes to speech from right-wingers to the point that all criticism is considered hate, but that’s probably the reason you’re getting the bans. (Not sure if they tell you what rule you supposedly violated when they ban you on Facebook.)
Except they don’t censor “I’m going to kill you” when the posters name is Abdul or Mohammed
Sodomites are notorious child molesters. Trannies should be treated like the freaks they are.
Those were my comments
They may be objecting to the use of the word “sodomy”, which has come to be a pejorative. Discussing “gay sex” might be acceptable.
They refer me to the community standards and fair enough it can be considered hate speech due to sexual orientation. Fine but then what can you say. Can you mention what happened to Sodom? In those standards though it is clear they don’t enforce the intolerance of death threats if they are uttered by Muslims. Trump needs to investigate Facebook because they have a legal duty to report death threats to authorities.
Just say cornnhole. It’s a game.
I’ll try that lol. I guess I am probably cruising to a permanent ban
if he was PRO sodomy he wouldn’t have gotten censored.
I don’t want Facebook investigated.
I want them decapitated.
Facebook is evil—don’t need an investigation to figure _that_.
I use to be of the opinion that it is from government we should fear censorship. I did not foresee this mass corporate conspiracy to promote a liberal point of view by Google and Facebook. I underestimated the how human reliance on these companies would grant them so much power over us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.