Posted on 02/12/2020 11:51:54 AM PST by ransomnote
Note: The FTC will host a conference call for media with FTC Chairman Joe Simons:
Date: Feb. 11, 2020
Time: 1 p.m. ET
Call-in: 877-226-8216, confirmation number 4193234
Call-in lines, which are for media only, will open 15 minutes prior to the start of the call.
The Federal Trade Commission issued Special Orders to five large technology firms, requiring them to provide information about prior acquisitions not reported to the antitrust agencies under the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act. The orders require Alphabet Inc. (including Google), Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Facebook, Inc., and Microsoft Corp. to provide information and documents on the terms, scope, structure, and purpose of transactions that each company consummated between Jan. 1, 2010 and Dec. 31, 2019.
The Commission issued these orders under Section 6(b) of the FTC Act, which authorizes the Commission to conduct wide-ranging studies that do not have a specific law enforcement purpose. The orders will help the FTC deepen its understanding of large technology firms’ acquisition activity, including how these firms report their transactions to the federal antitrust agencies, and whether large tech companies are making potentially anticompetitive acquisitions of nascent or potential competitors that fall below HSR filing thresholds and therefore do not need to be reported to the antitrust agencies.
“Digital technology companies are a big part of the economy and our daily lives,” said FTC Chairman Joe Simons. “This initiative will enable the Commission to take a closer look at acquisitions in this important sector, and also to evaluate whether the federal agencies are getting adequate notice of transactions that might harm competition. This will help us continue to keep tech markets open and competitive, for the benefit of consumers.”
The Special Orders require each recipient to identify acquisitions that were not reported to the FTC and the U.S. Department of Justice under the HSR Act, and to provide information similar to that requested on the HSR notification and report form. The orders also require companies to provide information and documents on their corporate acquisition strategies, voting and board appointment agreements, agreements to hire key personnel from other companies, and post-employment covenants not to compete. Last, the orders ask for information related to post-acquisition product development and pricing, including whether and how acquired assets were integrated and how acquired data has been treated.
The Commission plans to use the information obtained in this study to examine trends in acquisitions and the structure of deals, including whether acquisitions not subject to HSR notification might have raised competitive concerns, and the nature and extent of other agreements that may restrict competition. The Commission also seeks to learn more about how small firms perform after they are acquired by large technology firms. These and related issues were discussed during several sessions of the FTC’s 2018 Hearings on Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century, and this study is part of the follow-up from those Hearings.
The FTC has a statutory right under the HSR Act to review acquisitions and mergers over a certain size before they are consummated, and the study will help the Commission consider whether additional transactions should be subject to premerger notification requirements. The orders will also contribute broadly to the FTC’s understanding of technology markets, and thereby support the FTC’s program of vigorous and effective enforcement to promote competition and protect consumers in digital markets.
The Commission vote to approve issuing the Special Orders was 5-0. Commissioners Christine S. Wilson and Rohit Chopra issued a joint statement.
The Federal Trade Commission develops policy initiatives on issues that affect competition, consumers, and the U.S. economy. Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, read our blogs, and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.
MEDIA CONTACT:
Betsy Lordan
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-3707
STAFF CONTACT:
Bilal Sayyed, Director
Office of Policy Planning
202-326-2004
Things are starting to get interesting since the Faux Impeachment got ousted.
Amazon, Facebook and Alphabet (Google) could face much more serious scrutiny because of their huge influence on the retail sector (Amazon) and the Internet (Facebook and Google).
Alphabet needs to be broken up (Google/Android/YouTube)
I used to work at a company that was bought by apple. It was subsequently sold off by them though.
If you want on or off the Apple/Mac/iOS Ping List, Freepmail me.
I doubt Amazon would have to spin off Whole Foods... it’s not as if that grocer has a dominant position (or even is aiming for that).
Not sure about their ownership of the Washington Post - again, it doesn’t create a monopoly, does it?
This is all a bit beyond my pay grade!
But Alphabet (aka - Google) is a whole other situation. They dominate so many aspects of the marketplace - from arguably the most used mobile operating system (also found in many static devices like streaming boxes and Smart TVs). The FTC may indeed force the spin-off of some big chunks... We shall see.
p
Deep state BS? The FTC had its chances at the times of these deals.
Amazon also needs to spin off AWS ...
I think AWS is big enough to stand on its own. Don’t be surprised if it does get spun off anyway within the next 3-4 years.
“I think AWS is big enough to stand on its own.”
no question about it ... i think it’s bigger than the next three biggest cloud platforms in the U.S. put together, or at least it was a year ago when i last checked.
“Dont be surprised if it does get spun off anyway within the next 3-4 years.”
the problem with doing that though i think, is that amazon.com itself has hardly ever been profitable on its own, and so i think it’s amazon.com that wouldn’t be able to stand on its own ... plus, i suspect the billions amazon spent in the last few months to build amazon delivery practically overnight must have come from AWS profits ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.