[Repeal The 17th]

Proves nothing.
“Anonymous” referred to a book author, not the Q-Klutz-Clan.

[bagster]

Proves nothing. “Anonymous” referred to a book author, not the Q-Klutz-Clan.

Okay, boomer.

[RummyChick]

is that the context of the question. were they discussing the book?

[MountainWalker]

Exactly. Wasn’t q-anon whoever he is the one saying to trust Mr. Magoo AG Sessions? Zzzzzz

[romanesq]

““Anonymous” referred to a book author, not the Q-Klutz-Clan.”

On Monday, Joe diGenova said he and his wife Victoria dined with an official who said the White House identified the WH staffer who posted an article in the NY Times as Anonymous against President Trump.

So, that’s current and out there. President Trump responds to that topic about the Slimes article under the author, “Anonymous” but sadly the less than intelligent scammed by the QAnon grifters at the Paytrio Shitbox thinks this is about their fake Qult god.

No amount of facts will change this as they are not intelligent enough to admit they were scammed and move on.

Sad!

[SomeCallMeTim]

Proves nothing. “Anonymous” referred to a book author, not the Q-Klutz-Clan.

Correct... this is the reason reasonable people doubt the Q Anon story. They Hypeth, too much.

[bkopto]

You are correct.