Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Zodiac: 5 Things Fincher’s Movie Gets Right About The Unsolved Case (& 5 It Gets Wrong)
SCREENRANT ^ | JAN 17, 2020 | COLIN MCCORMICK

Posted on 02/02/2020 10:31:30 AM PST by nickcarraway

The story of the Zodiac killer has fascinated the public for decades and inspired David Fincher. What did he get right and wrong about the cases?

The story of the Zodiac killer is one that has continued to fascinate the public for over fifty years. While not the first serial killer to terrorize America, the Zodiac was unique for speaking publicly about his murders via letters that were published in San Francisco newspapers.

Though the case of the Zodiac killer remains unsolved, it has been the subject of interest in Hollywood for years, with the most famous depiction being David Fincher's 2007 Zodiac. The film is often praised as being one of the most historically accurate films based on real events. Of course, it does still take some liberties as well as exclude key details. Here are some things Zodiac gets right about the case and some things it gets wrong.

10 Right: Robert Graysmith's Obsession

The movie focuses on various people involved in the case, but the main focus is Robert Graysmith (Jake Gyllenhaal). Graysmith was a cartoonist at The Chronicle, one of the newspapers Zodiac communicated with. He eventually began his own investigation and wrote a book on the subject.

The movie shows Graysmith becoming consumed with the case and his obsession leads to the end of his marriage. By Graysmith's own admission, this is accurate as the investigation took over all aspects of his life and his family-life suffered as a result.

9 Wrong: Paul Avery

Another one of the main characters in the film is Paul Avery (Robert Downey Jr.), the crime reporter at The Chronicle. Avery was a central figure in some aspects of the investigation and was indeed named by the killer as a future target, but large aspects of his characterization in the film are fictionized.

While Avery and Graysmith did work together, their close collaboration on the Zodiac case is something largely invented by the film. Avery is also depicted as falling into poor health and living a reclusive life, still obsessed with the killings. Those close to him have claimed this is inaccurate.

8 Right: Arthur Leigh Allen As Suspect

Though the case remains unsolved, the movie does narrow in on one prime suspect, Arthur Leigh Allen (John Carroll Lynch). The movie shows Allen to be a favorite suspect of detective Dave Toschi (Mark Ruffalo) who has a mountain of circumstantial evidence linking him to the crimes.

Allen was indeed a person of interest in the case who Toschi favored as the killer. Also, much of the evidence against Allen that is presented in the movie was real. He did wear boots that matched the crime scene footprints, he did wear a watch that had a Zodiac symbol, and he did talk to friends about ideas that eerily match the later killings.

7 Wrong: Cecelia Shepard And Bryan Hartnell zodiac killer in Zodiac The second Zodiac attack depicted in the film is of Cecelia Shepard and Bryan Hartnell on September 27, 1969. The film shows the young couple cuddling by a lake when they are approached by a masked gunman who then tied them up and stabbed them. Only Hartnell survived the attack.

While the movie follows Hartnell's account of the attack incredibly closely, the movie does make one small and false insinuation. The scene gives the impression that the two are a romantic couple whereas they were simply friends at the time. Interestingly, Fincher added in a line about Hartnell's major in school to hint they might not be as close as we'd assume.

6 Right: Rick Marshall

One of the tensest scenes in the film finds Graysmith visiting a colleague of suspect Rick Marshall. Graysmith thinks he finds a sample of Marshall's writing that perfectly matches Zodiac, but the man informs him it is his own writing. As Graysmith's nervousness increases, he hears footsteps from the floor above and leaves in a hurry.

Remarkably, this is based on a real incident Graysmith claims happened to him while looking into Marshall as a suspect. Some other investigators have theorized this friend of Marshall's helped him in some way.

5 Wrong: Woman In The Car Golden Gate Bridge in Zodiac Another extremely disturbing scene finds a woman and her baby who is given a ride by a stranger after being stranger on the highway. While the man appears to be a helpful good Samaritan at first, he soon threatens to kill them both before the woman escapes the car with her child.

This is based on a true incident, and not only did the woman claim it was the Zodiac in the car, but the killer took credit for it in another letter. However, as time past, police began to have major doubts that this was indeed the Zodiac.

4 Right: Zodiac's Lies

Though the movie does seem to present that particular case as one involving the Zodiac, it also mentions the doubt surrounding the case which leads to an interesting revelation. Paul Avery identifies a number of crimes Zodiac claimed credit for without offering any evidence, unlike the other murders. This suggests Zodiac was trying to appear more deadly than he really was.

This is something that police discovered as the investigation went on and Zodiac's letters continued. He took credit for murders they knew he had nothing to do with. Many see this as the killer's attempt to remain in the spotlight.

3 Wrong: Codebreaker Robert Downey Jr and Jake Gyllenhaal in Zodiac The movie shows that the first letter Zodiac sent to newspapers included a code which he claimed included his identity. While the killer presented it as a brilliant and unbreakable code, it was solved fairly quickly by a high school teacher and his wife days after it was published.

An interesting aspect that the movie leaves out is that the man who broke the code became a suspect in the crimes for a short time. Police were suspicious of how quickly he broke the code as well as some very circumstantial evidence. Many believe it was simply a desperate movie by police.

2 Right: The Zodiac On Live Television

The movie does a great job of showing how the public became so obsessed with the Zodiac and the story around him. This is best seen in the sequence in which the killer calls into a news program live on the air to speak with Melvin Belli (Brian Cox).

The idea of a serial killer calling into a news show seems so farfetched, but this incident really did happen. While there's no way to confirm that it was the real killer who was speaking on live television, given the killer's apparent desire for the spotlight, it's entirely possible he would do such a thing.

1 Wrong: Other Suspects Real Horror Movie Origins Zodiac Killer While the movie doesn't come to any conclusions about the case, it does strongly hint at the fact that Arthur Leigh Allen was the Zodiac killer. This isn't surprising as much of the movie is based on Robert Graysmith's book who came to that eventual conclusion.

However, the movie does ignore some important things to arrive at Allen as such a convincing suspect, which is something Graysmith has been criticized for. There were several other key suspects, including Richard Gaikowski who, similar to Allen, had a lot of circumstantial evidence against him. It also fails to mention Allen's DNA failing to match DNA found at the scene of one of the crimes.


TOPICS: History; Music/Entertainment; Society
KEYWORDS: btkkiller; california; garyfrancisposte; movies; sanfrancisco; zodiackiller

1 posted on 02/02/2020 10:31:30 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
If you believe the various documentaries, Arthur Leigh Allen did the Zodiac murders in an attempt to set himself up as an assassin-for-hire.

"I can kill people and get away with it" was his pitch.

All of the Zodiac victims were randomly chosen and completely opportunistic. In no case did he say in advance who would be killed.

2 posted on 02/02/2020 10:35:35 AM PST by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrats' John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

That’s ridiculous.


3 posted on 02/02/2020 10:41:11 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I think the Zodiac killer was Bill Clinton. Because there is no crime you can name I won’t believe he committed


4 posted on 02/02/2020 11:01:11 AM PST by Fai Mao (There is no rule of law in the US until The PIAPS is executed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

LOL! I’ll buy that!


5 posted on 02/02/2020 1:27:33 PM PST by Hardastarboard (Three most annoying words on the internet - "Watch the video")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

My niece is in a movie in which she portrays the crazy leftwing professor who began a love affair with the Zodiak killer. The director is the child of the affair between them, and the woman who had a child with the convicted Zodiak killer is still alive, and was extensively interviewed by her. I can’t wait to dig into the backstory. What I learn will be shared on this or a similar thread at a later date.


6 posted on 02/02/2020 2:02:51 PM PST by Glad2bnuts (“If there are no absolutes by which to judge society, then society is absolute.” Francis Schaeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Two funfacts about Paul Avery:

1.After Zodiac threatened to kill him, other San Fran Chronicle reporters began wearing buttons that said, “I am not Paul Avery.”

2.Avery was married to Margot St. James, the activist who started C.O.Y.O.T.E., the hooker’s union.


7 posted on 02/02/2020 2:12:20 PM PST by mumblypeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I worked with a guy back in the 80’s that was the very image of the Zodiac sketches. He used to say he didn’t hunt because he liked to hunt - he hunted because he liked to kill things. Most of us left him alone.


8 posted on 02/02/2020 7:20:52 PM PST by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite its unfashionability)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mumblypeg

Coyote = Call Off Your Old Tired Ethics


9 posted on 02/02/2020 10:00:46 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson