Posted on 01/30/2020 11:23:09 AM PST by Eddie01
Edited on 01/30/2020 12:05:03 PM PST by Jim Robinson. [history]
Lawyers for a woman who accuses President Donald Trump of raping her in the 1990s are asking for a DNA sample, seeking to determine whether his genetic material is on a dress she says she wore during the encounter.
Advice columnist E. Jean Carroll
(Excerpt) Read more at ktla.com ...
And she waits 30 years, during the entire period of which Trump was still rich and there were still plenty of greedy lawyers, 30 years until the statute of limitations has expired for both criminal and civil relief, and then proceeds under a theory of defamation because he recently called her a liar when she finally mentions this allegation. Trump could proceed under the same theory of defamation because she called him a rapist. She threw down. She has the burden of proof. The timing is highly questionable, just for starters. Saving up a semen-stained dress for 30 years of inaction further emphasizes how questionable this allegation is.
“Secondly, any American male who is accustomed to attracting women, and for sure Trump was in that category, probably from grade school, will not seek out, as a predator, to get women, rather, the women will be seeking him.”
Slick Willie was in that category, but he wasn’t above forcing himself at least once.
No, slick Willie was not like that. In fact, he was more a Bill Cosby...
That is SICK!!! As a woman, I do not understand how a rape victim would want to keep the dress she wore in her bedroom or in her home. A true rape victim would not! It would be a constant reminder. Did she keep other momentoes of the attack?
Four men because she was trying to plant DNA.
Just give a cheek swab, E. Jean.....
okay dokey, not serious.
Now just a cotton pickin’ minit here. Let’s be fair. He was a gentleman, and told her to put ice on her cut lip. He probably even pointed towards a small refrigerator with an ice cube tray in it before slamming the door. What more could she want.
I remember reading accounts about how when he entered the room women would throng around Slick Willie.
I’m talking about when a man is growing up, having women fawning on them. It creates a certain confidence in you, which is good and bad. Good in the sense that it builds your young ego, bad in the sense that you tend to give the minimum in a relationship, rather than the most, but that’s typical of men and a whole other topic for discussion.
Clinton, was a late bloomer in that regard...I doubt very much that he had little girls swooning over him.
PLUS, CLINTON MOST LIKELY HAD A SEXUAL ADDICTION. TRUMP DOES NOT HAVE A SEXUAL ADDICTION.
Clinton, like Cosby, like Weinstein, all used their position of power to abuse women.
Funny, how the people who are criticizing Trump all have no idea what it’s like, being an all American good looking normal man. I doubt very much that Trump ever forced himself on anyone...
I’m sure it was all foreplay...whether we’re talking about Stormy Daniels or the rest of them, like the playboy bunnies etc.
Foreplay, that is consensual is not rape.. I’ve been single for 25 years. If consensual foreplay is rape, then I along with a lot of normal men would be in court constantly.
Oh, and one more. Making a pass at a woman, is not harassment, is not rape, is not anything other than doing what our genes tell us to do.
OTOH, when you make a pass at a woman, and she rebukes you or tells you to knock it off, and YOU CONTINUE, then the woman has an issue.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.