Replies

Odd the briefed them by party. If it was an external threat everyone should get the same briefing. I suspect there are internals to one party that prevented briefing both the same way. I can only guess (roll eyes) which had the issue.

Here is how the article explains why: "Republicans and Democrats were briefed separately, and under Kansas law the parties are allowed to hold closed-door caucus meetings, but rarely do in practice." Read more here: https://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/article239282433.html#storylink=cpy

Sounds like it was important enough to be very secure and legal.

CGato

804 posted on 01/15/2020 4:59:50 PM PST by Conservative Gato (Now there are 4 kind of lies... Lies, Damned Lies, Statistics and the Media)

To: Conservative Gato

All that says is it’s allowed. It doesn’t say why.

811 posted on 01/15/2020 5:07:35 PM PST by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary that good men do nothing)

To: Conservative Gato

If it was an external threat everyone should get the same briefing.

Unless, of course, you don't trust the RATs.

(and why should you?)

1,006 posted on 01/16/2020 7:21:30 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (We need to reach across the aisle, extend a hand...And slap the crap out of them)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794