Skip to comments.New York Times writer gets history wrong, claims abortion was always widely accepted
Posted on 12/28/2019 9:35:36 AM PST by Morgana
click here to read article
Anthony Comstock and Comstock's law!
Mr. Comstock chased Margaret Sanger to the Gates of Hell for mailing and promoting birth control by way of US mail. It was considered "obscene" at the time.
If only we had 1000+ Anthony Comstocks today
He is called the father of lies for a reason.
Know you are a history buff and I read your posts just don’t comment on them. Don’t know how much of this history you know of but thought I’d ping you anyway. I know the history of this way back to the 1700’s in America, yes women were trying abortions back then too.
It’s a little more than that they are trying to change/rewrite history.
I know the history of this, Abortion on demand was NEVER accepted.
Now in some places, mind you some places it was allowed until “quickening” but on demand? NEVER.
However, as one might expect, there are a number of false claims in the article.
I would be surprised if there were any true statements in the article.
Of course. Laura Nicole, the Women’s Libber, will lie through her teeth to get what she wants like they all do.
The Left is really going All In on this stuff now. They are not clever. They are not artful. They are not mis-speaking. They just lie, lie, lie, lie, lie.
It was not considered murder but that doesnt mean it was socially acceptable. Even though it was not considered murder they passed laws banning abortion in most of not all states.
Abortion is murder
I tell my kids the simple truth about the Democratic and Republican Party
The Democratic Party hates babies and wants to kill them and murder them and then chop them up and sell their body parts
The republican party wants babies to be born taken care of and loved
Thats all you need to know about the two parties
The New York Times is doing likewise with Transgenerism, gender nuetral and any of the other sexual perverted lifestyles today...... proclaiming these too are “ widely accepted” when in fact all these are promoted, financed, and ‘pushed on society’ by news network conglomerates and special interest groups of the left to weaken this nation.
Next they will probably say that “most Republicans are guilty until they prove themselves innocent”...Oops too late.
I remind Liberals that Margaret Sanger and all she stood for was greatly admired by Der Fuhrer Adolph Hitler.
For example, Sanger wanted Blacks culled like weeds. Hitler agreed.
Well its her truth anyway.
The Left lies so much because most people are ignorant of the facts and fall for it. They love ‘em dumbed down and stupid and ignorant.
“It was not considered murder but that doesnt mean it was socially acceptable.”
Even though it definitely was murder, it may not have been considered in that light years ago. It may have been a simple case of decent human beings being repulsed by such a ghoulish and inhuman procedure. People who can look at abortion and not want/need to vomit has something missing in their genetic makeup — or Satan indwelling them.
Its called lying.
You have to wonder about anyone who believes killing children in the womb is okay.
The New York Times 1619 project is being criticized for lying repeatedly about history, too.
Professors tell New York Times to correct the many errors in its 1619 Project
The 1619 Project Gets Schooled
The New York Times tries to rewrite U.S. history, but its falsehoods are exposed by surprising sources
During ancient times there was a plant, Silphium, that apparently used as a contraceptive and abortifacient. Whether or not it worked as advertised, it was harvested to extinction during the time of the Roman Empire.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.