Finally the truth comes out. The next question is, how are they still in business? Who is really funding them?
Yep.
Though, I do notice enough lib travelers gazing at it to probably make it worth their while.
Which is why they get on the plane hopping mad and take it out on the other passenger who is wearing a MAGA hat, minding his own business.
CNN is a hate group.
CNN>>>Its also where most if not all of Europe gets the news about America.
George Soros and his backers (nations and groups hostile to The United States) must be astonished at how cheap they can buy the whores at CNN.
The Minneapolis airport is paid $200 thousand, and CNN furnishes and maintains the equipment.
Sure be NICE if someone closer to our side, like Fox, could scrounge up, say, $10 Million and displace them...but never seems to happen.
......................and?
[ CNN Pays 58 Airports $100,000 Each to Play Channel at Gates ]
Aren’t airline passengers suffering enough already?
Must they be brainwashed by propaganda artists, too?
Why not play some screeching Yoko Ono instead?
Perhaps airports could charge passengers a “ no CNN convenience fee”?
I’m in
The real fools in this venture are the advertisers...
Second is the airports selling out cheap.
If CNN will pay $100,000 to target advertisers think how much MORE advertisers would pay airports DIRECTLY for 100% ads run 24/7...
Why should airports have CNN offensive content in-between ads? Just run ads.
Time to start a bidding war. Even if CNN out bids, they will paying a lot more money out of their pocket.
CNN not knowing it’s a comedy channel that eases peoples mind before boarding the plane.
“ As Carlson explained, CNN is paying the airports approximately $100,000 each to “pump propaganda into America’s airports, holding its hapless travelers hostage.””
It’s a hostage crisis all over our nation.
It’s too bad that travelers waiting at airports do not have some sort of electronic devices in their hands where they can read the news of their choosing.
By the way, doing some quick math:
If there are 200 screens per airport, and each screen uses, say 100 Watts, that’s 20kW running non-stop, which then costs the airport about $30,000 in electricity per year. The airport still comes out ahead, but pissing off half of your customers by forcing them to move to ‘unbiased locations’ to get away from those animals, for $70,000 a year, seriously?
My theory is CIA pays CNN who pays airports. Where does CIA get the $$$?
MORE “PreDictive Programming”!!!!!!!
*****************
GunnyG@PlanetWTF?/WNW!
***
SemperTRUMP.45!
++++++++++++++++++
I believe Southwest Airlines plays Fox News.
“CNN is paying the airports approximately $100,000 each to “pump propaganda into America’s airports, holding its hapless travelers hostage.”
”Wow! A bribe to force passengers to listen to staccato blabbering nonsense? That is a Quid Quo Pro ! They should be completely removed from the airport premises PRONTO,.No games and no delay
Um- that would be like a person- business owner, paying $6,000,000 just to have people walk by their store front- Certainly this can’t be a lucrative business deal-
let’s say 200 people decide to shop as a result during the year- they purchase say 200 items for about $100 apiece- the store makes a profit of say 20% on each item- that’s a $8000 profit- (Ugg my math is probably wrong!)
anyways- the point is that spending $6,000,000 to get back several thousand doesn’t seem like a winning strategy