Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: blueunicorn6

Pretty sure the agreement was the other way around.

The other thing is that after yet another one of British Admiral Pound’s disasters, the sinking of Prince of Wales and Repulse off what is now Malaysia, the British didn’t *have* anything they could risk in the Pacific so any agreement would have been moot then.


82 posted on 12/01/2019 11:30:01 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Spktyr

I thought so, too, but I believe I have it right.

The British really wanted to be sure we were as involved as possible in the Atlantic.

The British were also quite concerned with Singapore.

I always wondered what the Japanese Navy did after Pearl Harbor?

They sailed into the Indian Ocean and scared Churchill something fierce.


111 posted on 12/02/2019 11:44:36 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson