[madison10]

This is a crock. $2500 is NOT “bankrolling.” CFA matched a fund for an employee. It is in the contracts. Someone probably did not look up the acronym.

[dp0622]

That’s the “big” issue in this article and what you say is true.

I think what bothers people is them abandoning the other charities at the bequest of gays.

Good think that i’m so lazy or i might have finally driven out of my way to eat there one time :)

[deport]

Poor ol’ CFA. Always teeing someone off. Life serving the
public is a bitch. Don’t know how any company survives.

[Theo]

Exactly. Nobody likes reading past the click-bait headline.

[JimRed]

This is a crock. $2500 is NOT “bankrolling.”

Exactly; you beat me to it.

[devane617]

DITTO! Click-bait. Nothing more.

[whistleduck]

And your ready explanation for failing to support the Salvation Army?

[Impala64ssa]

CFA matched a fund for an employee. It is in the contracts. Someone probably did not look up the acronym.
Like the Combined Federal Campaign. Fed employees can have portions of their paychecks, with the fed agencies matching funds donated to certain charities and non profits listed with the CFC. One thing's certain, the CFA Foundation really needs a shake up and exercise some SERIOUS due diligence when it comes to deciding which entities to donate to.

[ChildOfThe60s]

Yep, I agree.

[BobL]

“This is a crock. $2500 is NOT “bankrolling.” CFA matched a fund for an employee. It is in the contracts. Someone probably did not look up the acronym.”

Ok, perhaps. When CFA DENOUNCES the SPLC, then we’ll agree with you.

...but I really don’t expect that.