To: Openurmind
26 posted on
11/16/2019 4:13:53 PM PST by
HangnJudge
(Kipling was right about Humanity)
To: HangnJudge
If you live to be 92 which is statistically unlikely
28 posted on
11/16/2019 4:15:07 PM PST by
Chickensoup
(Voter ID for 2020!! Leftists totalitarian fascists appear to be planning to eradicate conservatives)
To: HangnJudge
40 posted on
11/16/2019 4:30:11 PM PST by
Openurmind
(The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
To: HangnJudge
Thank you.
That graph put it in much better context.
the change over is 80 years old which you're not a spring chicken running around the world anymore anyway. Also at 95 years old it's $100,000 difference.
65 posted on
11/16/2019 5:11:24 PM PST by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
To: HangnJudge
That’s exactly what my spreadsheet crunching showed — breakeven is 81-82. If you believe you’ll live well past that, delay receiving. Assumes the system will be solvent and keep pace with inflation.
To: HangnJudge
Bad math. Doesn’t use a discount rate at all.
133 posted on
11/16/2019 8:55:12 PM PST by
Uncle Miltie
(Epstein proves it's all a charade.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
