I wonder why it bombed...
The last original idea left H-wood’s clueless upper class a good while ago.
Terminator was very good but failed at BO when they had 3 women in the lead and Arnold doesn’t show up til half way through and he has shacked up with a Mexican woman and her son.
Never forget, the director is the Hollywood scumbag who spoke against Trump at the DNC convention. Congrats on her failure as a director.
“The Elizabeth Banks-directed-written and produced pic”
Are we supposed to know who Elizabeth Banks is?
Re Charlie’s Angels, the movie going consumers are too young to know it. Banks ought not have banked on a built in base audience of any significance.
A remake with a bunch of Trump haters and a #MeToo message..yeah I’ll pass
Read the Breitbart article about this movie. The very first lines in the movie are male bashing and it continues all the way through the movie.
On of the most anti male movies ever made.
At the end of the movie it turns out “Charlie” is really a woman all along using a male voice.
LOL! Saw some previews for it the other day and it went into the ‘WILL NOT SEE’ binder instantly.
Hollywood can’t put out anything original because they have lost the ability for creativity.......all these reruns and reboots have terrible new actors as well. No talent as they all look and sound like they’re acting rather than assuming the character they’re playing.
I see problem right there...
The previews are awful.
Elizabeth Banks is a babe. Maybe that’s all you can say.
Hollywood writers write from the vantage point of creepy burned-out ‘elites’... No matter what they put on paper or how they dress down the characters they’re still creepy burned-out phony elites.
Until the writers can figure out the vantage points of
the rest of us their films will be crap.
Their films will only appeal to their fellow creepy ‘elites’. (translation: the films won’t make any money - and since most of these guys can’t do ‘art’ - - the films become ‘crap that doesn’t sell)
HOLLYWOOD: Hey, wanna see ANOTHER remake of Charlie’s Angels? EXCITING, RIGHT?!
AUDIENCES: Again? Didn’t you JUST remake it in 2011? No thanks.
HOLLYWOOD: But it’s gonna be a BIG BUDGET MOVIE this time!!!! GREENLIT!!!!
AUDIENCES: Ummmm... yeah you already did that too, with Cameron Diaz, Drew Barrymore, and Lucy Liu. And that in the 2000s as well. Please stop.
HOLLYWOOD: But this time we got SIR PATRICK STEWART as BOSLEY!!! NOW you’re psyched for the movie, YESSSSSS???
AUDIENCES: Look, the ONLY reason people even watched the original 70s version was Farrah Fawcett. Got it? The concept wasn’t even that interesting to begin with. Stop wasting Patrick Stewart’s talent on trash like this.
HOLLYWOOD: But THIS version is gonna be all modern and hip and feminist enpowering and inspire young girls to—
AUDIENCES: SHUT UP ALREADY!!!!
Since gender-swapped remakes are the big-budget rage, maybe it would have done better with 3 men as “angels”.
A lot of much better porn is available currently. It doesn't even rate today.
My guess is that Hollywood has lost any sense of creativity. Enough with the remakes, in most cases you shouldn’t fool with the originals.