Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sacajaweau

Yep. Surprised so many here yesterday were of the mind that KK was within their legal rights to do anything once he legally purchased the product. Also, KK cant be held legally responsible for what he does with his own property later on. That brand protection and liability excuse was nonsense. Glad this was resolved quickly.


9 posted on 11/05/2019 10:24:22 AM PST by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Magnum44

I agree, I guess. But why can sports entities restrict the resale of tickets from someone who legitimately bought them?


18 posted on 11/05/2019 10:34:03 AM PST by tcoxaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Magnum44

How many?


31 posted on 11/05/2019 11:02:29 AM PST by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Magnum44

Depends on how he was advertising. If he was just saying he was reselling donuts that’s clean. If he was mentioning their trademarked brand KK has the right to shut him down.


41 posted on 11/05/2019 11:23:58 AM PST by discostu (I know that's a bummer baby, but it's got precious little to do with me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Magnum44
That brand protection and liability excuse was nonsense.

That only would apply if he were making counterfeit Krispy Kremes.

79 posted on 11/05/2019 12:28:55 PM PST by luvbach1 (I hope Trump runs roughshod over the inevitable obstuctionists, Dems, progs, libs, or RINOs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson