Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu

Nope, you are talking out your proverbial bottom. Since he advertised his business as Krispy Kreme it is infringement. Had he called Donut Sales he would not be infringing as long as he noted that KK was the trademark holder when reselling Krispy Kream donuts.


72 posted on 11/05/2019 12:05:09 PM PST by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (TRUMP TRAIN !!! Get the hell out of the way if you are not on yet because we don't stop for idiots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

Nope. I’m right, and your need to put insults in every post shows you know it. But you can’t admit it.

Had he called it donut sales he would not have been infringing because he wasn’t using their trademark. Acknowledging the trademark does nothing. Well if it goes to court it proves you knew you were violating trademark.


77 posted on 11/05/2019 12:22:10 PM PST by discostu (I know that's a bummer baby, but it's got precious little to do with me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

Should have just called it Donuthole Run, Donuts and the Bandit, or Donut Deliverance.


90 posted on 11/05/2019 1:00:29 PM PST by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson