MORE AT THE LINK
In other words: Shes as stupid as they come and shes been promoted to a position that sounds useful, but isnt.
“Kafka in Foggy Bottom: impeachment transcript reveals fear of Trump tweets”
What a surprise, just like the Hussein Heads here: “I wish Trump would stop tweeting....”
They act like Trump is a godfather. He’s the nicest guy I can imagine. If me or half the people here were multi-billionaires it’d look like a Sopranos episode. These internal spies and saboteurs would all get whacked pumping gas, answering the door, thinking they were going to a social event, etc.
Trump is a nice guy if you ask me.
Death by tweets. The left is so lost.
This is one big load of horse hockey. Their “impeachment” case must really be crumbling.
What’s Kafkaesque is the secret impeachment crap.
It’s The Trial.
Every single Ambassador, DCM, Attache and embassy floor sweeper serves at the pleasure of the President and he/she can fire every single one of them right now with “0” legal repercussion.
I have served at an Embassy and the Ambassador could also fire or kick out of country every single person in the Embassy. There might be a lot of political blowback to do so, and the president might remove them afterwards, but there could be no legal repercussions because they have that authority.
What a load of hooey this former Ambassador is trying to shovel.
Suddenly the guardian is all concerned over the welfare of a US ambassador. I don’t recall that much concern over the US ambassador to libya, who was murdered by fanatical m*slims for being gay.
That’s it, the Democrats are going to impeach Trump for tweeting while President.
Interesting line of reasoning. Can anyone trace out this logic, how to get from premise to conclusion?
This is rather like the Underpants Gnomes Profit Plan, as described in a South Park episode.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifGMwbfly0g
Something seems to be missing in the middle.
Kafka’s Trial didn’t have as much intrigue as this one.
We know something that she's not telling us about. And from the transcript of the call, it looks like the President of Ukraine knew something, too.
In another vein....Ukraine put out information on the phone call in their country to the population. Where is that text?
Who is in charge of the Administration? Who makes foreign policy?
I forgot.
Another witness that appears to be more Russian and anti-Trump. Vindman is another.
Of course they are afraid of Trump tweets.
The Mad Tweeter has them on the ropes. He is constantly destroying their carefully prepared naratives, exposing the fakeness of their very very fake news. Pointing out their corruption, which is such an abuse of power.
Oh, and since it is the Guardian, I should add:
The US does not have responsible government where cabinet officials and ministers must hold the confidence of the House of Representatives.
This was carefully considered at Philadelphia and rejected in favor of a (temporary) unitary executive.
Our current temporary unitary executive is named Donald John Trump, and we sent him there to have a paralyzing hold on the Executive Branch, which he has not completely succeeded at, but so far has done tolerably well.
Wow, who knew Trump could send a death-ray thunderbolt by Twitter?!
Awwww, was she swooning? Did the career donothingocrat get the vapors?
This woman is a snowflake if there ever was one. She is a basket case. Nothing in her testimony seems to be based on fact. Everything seems to be based on her opinion. What did she know about Hunter and Joe Biden’s money laundering scheme. The U. S. taxpayer is forced to funnel tons of money to Ukraine, and the corrupt in Ukraine gave a portion of it to the Bidens to keep the money spigot open and flowing. How much did she know about the details?