Skip to comments.
Archaeology fossil teeth discovery in Germany could re-write human history
Deutsche Welle ^
| 19.10.2017
| Alistair Walsh
Posted on 11/02/2019 10:01:04 AM PDT by gnarledmaw
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
To: gnarledmaw
Most likely, archaeological false teeth as these "discoveries" trying to predate man prior to about 6000 years sooner or later turn up bogus.
2
posted on
11/02/2019 10:05:34 AM PDT
by
Jim W N
(MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
To: gnarledmaw
But, but, but, it was settled science? How could this happen?
3
posted on
11/02/2019 10:06:01 AM PDT
by
Dutch Boy
To: gnarledmaw
Ha! Get ready, Here we go...
Thanks for finding this and sharing it. :)
4
posted on
11/02/2019 10:06:03 AM PDT
by
Openurmind
(The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
To: gnarledmaw
"But these new teeth, found in the western German town of Eppelsheim near Mainz, are at least 4 million years older than the African skeletons, which has scientists so puzzled they held off publishing for a year.
Were they implants?
To: gnarledmaw
Found in a riverbed....washed in from somewhere? Could earth geographical features be marred (no pun intended) by earthquakes...volcanoes...asteroids...floods? Among other things
6
posted on
11/02/2019 10:09:27 AM PDT
by
Getready
(Wisdom is more valuable than gold and diamonds, and harder to find.)
To: gnarledmaw
"...but I would hypothesize that we shall have to start rewriting the history of mankind after today," Again?
7
posted on
11/02/2019 10:10:58 AM PDT
by
TomServo
To: gnarledmaw
Most of the known science in this field is based on where they find fossils
8
posted on
11/02/2019 10:11:54 AM PDT
by
RightGeek
(FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
To: Jim 0216
9
posted on
11/02/2019 10:15:01 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Break out the mustard seeds.)
To: Getready
...washed in from somewhere?
Quite possibly, but Africa, where all the really old African stuff is usually found, isn’t upstream from the Rhine.
10
posted on
11/02/2019 10:19:52 AM PDT
by
hanamizu
To: hanamizu
11
posted on
11/02/2019 10:22:32 AM PDT
by
Openurmind
(The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
To: hanamizu
I meant to write “but Africa, where all the really old human/prehuman stuff is usually found...”
12
posted on
11/02/2019 10:25:16 AM PDT
by
hanamizu
To: mewzilla
Piltdown Part Deux. Precisely mon ami.
13
posted on
11/02/2019 10:25:50 AM PDT
by
Jim W N
(MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
To: Dutch Boy
Must have been a “Sell by” date on it huh?
14
posted on
11/02/2019 10:31:37 AM PDT
by
rktman
( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: Getready
15
posted on
11/02/2019 10:32:52 AM PDT
by
rktman
( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: gnarledmaw
What it upsets has less to do with the dates directly and more to do with questioning the “out of Africa” theory. The questions it opens up to the “human evolution” theories are (a) did the “hominids” in Africa start out earlier in central Europe, or (b) arise simultaneously (or contemporaniously) in multiple areas, not Africa alone. The extreme differences in the oldest examples from Africa and the new discovery are more suggestive of (a) than (b).
16
posted on
11/02/2019 10:35:54 AM PDT
by
Wuli
To: gnarledmaw
Hasn’t anyone ever wondered what the tooth fairy does with all the teeth she collects.....?
17
posted on
11/02/2019 10:37:39 AM PDT
by
Hot Tabasco
(I'm in the cleaning business.......I launder money)
To: gnarledmaw
18
posted on
11/02/2019 10:58:07 AM PDT
by
deport
To: Jim 0216
And there it is... The effort to shame anyone who even dares think outside the theological box. If you don’t believe it fine, why go out of your way to make sure no one else even discusses it without trying to shame them for doing so? There have been a whole lot of factual science and physics proven since your beliefs that originate from the personal self righteous theory of one cleric in the 1600’s.
Right off the bat geology alone disproves Ussher’s theory altogether. Being stuck in the 1600’s mentality does not further or help your own faith at all. It aids in discrediting the rationality and logic of your faith based on well known science. It does you no favors with your own argument and support of your faith. The Bible only indicates and suggests a MINIMUM age not a MAXIMUM age.
“Most likely, archaeological false teeth as these “discoveries” trying to predate man prior to about 6000 years sooner or later turn up bogus.”
It is only bogus to you because you personally refuse to accept anything other. If anything at all is proven sooner or later, it is like this find, OLDER not younger... and it keeps getting older and older as those who believe what you do remain stuck in the ignorance of the 1600’s. How many times does Ussher’s personal theory need to be proved wrong before you stop shoving it down the throats of others?
http://godandscience.org/youngearth/age_of_the_earth.html
19
posted on
11/02/2019 10:58:53 AM PDT
by
Openurmind
(The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
To: gnarledmaw
Come in mothership.
Blrrrt
Yes, I've run into lift-off problems. Can you send down a recovery vessel?
Blrrrt.
Oh, really? Bummer. I should be able to live off the environment until you return.
20
posted on
11/02/2019 11:05:32 AM PDT
by
frog in a pot
(Arguing the Founders intended the weakest of 2 possible forms of NBC for our leader is a scam.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson