Posted on 10/24/2019 1:10:48 PM PDT by Trump20162020
Judge Kim Cooks in the 255th Family District Court ruled today that seven-year-old James Younger and his twin brother would remain under a joint managing conservatorship under their parents, Jeff Younger and Anne Georgulas.
Cooks also gave the two parents joint decision making over all medical, dental, and psychiatric care for the twin boys, indicating that both the father and mother need to consent to the use of puberty blockers or other aspects of a medical transition.
Attorney fees are split.
Cooks also issued a gag order on the father.
(Excerpt) Read more at thetexan.news ...
1. How do you make joint decisions when the parties are diametrically opposed? The court is supposed to help decide disputes not make decisions impossible.
2. How does a judge have the authority to remove a citizen’s First Amendment rights to freely express himself?!
The judge doesn’t want the light shined on the situation to protect the judge?
gag order only on the father?
If I were the father, I would ignore the judge. It was ONLY public outrage and the exercise of free-speech which changed the judge's mind, and gave him the ability to avoid the horror of having his son chemically castrated. Now this corrupt judge is offering half a loaf in exchange for threats to shut the father up? No way.
I'd go full blast. This case now has national attention. Let the judge try and penalize you for trying to stop your child from being mutilated and trampling on your first-amendment rights. See how that plays out for her. Any more attention to this, and this judge's career is over - that's why she wants a gag order.
by returning parental rights to the father, and allowing the child to remain in custody of the mother, they just did.
Worst possible move.
The judge would immediately rule against him.
That's what they're hoping for so they have proof the father can't be trusted.
In other words; if you want a form of justice, keep your mouth shut; interesting how the system works.
Why a gag order on the FATHER, who is actually biological parent? IMO CPS should still be involved, as well as the Texas AG.
The whole idea of chemically castrating a 7yo so he could be a transgender is incomprehensible - even to think about doing such a thing.
Dad was charged with child abuse?
its now in the court of public opinion, my friend. The ONLY reason the judge made the ruling she did was because of public outrage is embarrassing her. That’s why she wants it quashed.
Yes, he’s going on the court, but the father already has the ear of the Governor of Texas and national conservative politicians. Let the judge try make a martyr of him, and see how that works out for her.
I live in this area. There are complaints that the mother had sexual activists sharing the lie if they dont get affirmed, they die from suicide, save my baby and make him a girl! At the same time, friends of the family and parents of the boys playmates were NOT allowed to testify that James acts like a boy and identifies as James when away from the mother.
This is a mentally ill mother projecting onto her son, a child she likely wished was a girl. SHE decided hes really a girl when he liked a girls toy. SHE is pushing this.
This is a mentally ill mother projecting onto her son
—
This is not individual mental illness. This is the tyranny of group hysteria.
And she is NOT the biological mother.
She’s a Dr. Mengele looking for experimental subjects.
https://ballotpedia.org/Kim_Cooks
https://www.instagram.com/judgekimcooks/?hl=en
https://www.dallascounty.org/government/courts/family_district/255th/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/judge-kim-cooks-94bb0b46
https://voterguide.dallasnews.com/2018-primary/candidates/126/
https://www.facebook.com/KimCooksForJudgeOfThe255thFamilyDistrictCourt/
Already has a record with the TX Judicial Commission.
http://www.scjc.texas.gov/media/46710/cooks18-081918-0877pubwarnoae122018.pdf
I think Abbott's tweet mentioning the state AG's and CPS taking an interest in this case sent a very strong message.
No. The judge is reacting to the Governor getting involved. Instead of giving the boys (these are twins) to the mother and saying the father can’t see them unless he is indoctrinated and then totally goes along with the Mother’s delusion that James is a girl ... he gets a partial vote in the boys’ care and, a minor fop, doesn’t have to pay the ex-wife’s legal fees.
He’s been hit with a gag order, and the ruling is tailored to shut down the father’s legal fund. More importantly, the judge did NOT say the child isn’t going forward with sex hormone injections. It just says the father can have a SAY.
The mother is a pediatrician and political activist, so she’s already getting more weight in court in her delusion that one son is really a daughter. (It started when one twin boy liked the girls’ toy at McDonalds more than the boy toy.) The fact that she and her chosen consultants consider gender change medically appropriate has not changed.
Dad’s outgunned and now hamstrung.
Apparently, because both parents would have to sign off on the procedure. Since the father won't sign off, it ain't happening. Its as if the judge ruled in favor of the father.
The state AG is looking into this.
Dad is not outgunned.
I think you analyzed this correctly. This is a major victory for the Mengele side of this argument.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.