Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Northrop's satellite refueling spacecraft launches on October 9th
Engadget ^ | 10/06/2019 | Jon Fingas

Posted on 10/06/2019 9:30:35 AM PDT by BenLurkin

Northrop Grumman and NASA are launching a "first-of-its-kind" refueling vessel, the Mission Extension Vehicle, aboard a Russian rocket on October 9th. The inaugural MEV-1 will dock with an Intelsat satellite in three months' time and provide life-extending services over five years. After that, it should be free to help other satellites -- it'll still have 10 years' worth of fuel.

A second spacecraft, MEV-2, will help another Intelsat satellite in 2020 and should have the same amount of leftover fuel. Both MEVs are flexible, too. They can dock with 80 percent of current geostationary satellites, even if they weren't designed for servicing.

(Excerpt) Read more at engadget.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: northrop; refueling; satellite; spacecraft

1 posted on 10/06/2019 9:30:35 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

*ping*


2 posted on 10/06/2019 9:47:26 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Who will think of the gerbils ? Just say no to Buttgiggity !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

This is a big deal, especially if the missions can include not just refueling but maintenance and upgrades. I think it would be a bigger deal if it were put into orbit on an American launch vehicle.


3 posted on 10/06/2019 10:04:00 AM PDT by jz638
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I’m guessing that this kind of capability has already been used to service the very large NRO SIGINT sats in geo orbit ...if it hasn’t, then what was the breakdown?


4 posted on 10/06/2019 10:18:20 AM PDT by Bobalu (Buy and hold physical silver! Consider this a warning my FRiend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

Probably could also be used to gather up unwanted ones and defuel them?


5 posted on 10/06/2019 10:20:18 AM PDT by going hot (happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu
I’m guessing that this kind of capability has already been used to service the very large NRO SIGINT sats in geo orbit ...if it hasn’t, then what was the breakdown?

Hmm. Might explain the very long X-37 missions.

6 posted on 10/06/2019 10:37:50 AM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
"They can dock with 80 percent of current geostationary
satellites, even if they weren't designed for servicing."

Have American satellites been designed to be refueled in orbit?
Have they been designed for automated, robotic service in orbit?
When did this start?

7 posted on 10/06/2019 10:41:01 AM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

We’re letting Russia launch our Intelsat servicing vessels?

Don’t be surprised if those Intelsats are involved in accidents or “fail” at a critical time.


8 posted on 10/06/2019 11:45:08 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StormEye

The Northrop (Orbital) Mission Extension Vehicle DOES NOT REFUEL the client spacecraft. It latches on to spacecraft that have almost exhausted their fuel and provides station-keeping service for them so that they can continue to generate communications revenue for additional years. An actual first full scale refueling mission is in development by NASA and Maxar to demonstrate the technology on the old Landsat 7 satellite. Early docking and liquid transfer in-space experiments were done by DARPA over a decade ago.


9 posted on 10/06/2019 11:57:04 AM PDT by SFConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Wouldn’t it be wonderful if America could build its own rockets and such, instead of having to pay the godless Russians to drive us around in what is essentially a 40-year-old Soviet launch vehicle?


10 posted on 10/06/2019 5:16:34 PM PDT by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Thanks fieldmarshaldj. Of course, the booster that launches it will cost more than a dozen new satellites, but repeat over and over after me, *that's* not a subsidy!!!!

11 posted on 10/06/2019 6:16:27 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Not if you remember to return the rocket after you use it.

12 posted on 10/07/2019 3:37:42 AM PDT by jmcenanly ("The more corrupt the state, the more laws." Tacitus, Publius Cornelius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jmcenanly

:^)

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3784192/posts?page=8#8


13 posted on 10/07/2019 4:59:34 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson