Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Fido969

At the bottom of the very long article -


So far there have been few serious consequences for department big shots from Horowitz’s findings, even for McCabe. Trump supporters hanging their hopes on “straight-shooter” Horowitz getting to the bottom of alleged FBI surveillance abuses during the 2016 election could be disappointed.

Even if he does produce a tough report, it’s not likely to stay that way, department insiders say. They expect it to be watered down especially after Comey, Strzok, McCabe, Page and other officials mentioned in it get their own chance to make changes, reviewing it for “accuracy.”

Swecker says he’s already given up on Horowitz holding dirty agents accountable and is putting stock in prosecutor Durham’s wider probe into Trump-Russia’s origins.

“Durham is serious,” the former FBI official said, “and he has indictment authority.”


Sounds like Durham is either our last hope or football #27


6 posted on 10/01/2019 11:26:39 AM PDT by Pollard (If you don't understand what I typed, you haven't read the classics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pollard

Trump supporters hanging their hopes on “straight-shooter” Horowitz getting to the bottom of alleged FBI surveillance abuses during the 2016 election could be disappointed.


I’m not expecting Horowitz to get to the bottom of it. He just needs to provide enough of an opening for other people to get to the bottom of it. Ideally his report gives political cover to “follow the facts where they lead” and helps justify the more serious digging of guys like Durham.


12 posted on 10/01/2019 11:53:42 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson