[dfwgator]

I get to use this one again.....

“It looks like a giant....”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpiP_jN1Pv4

[fieldmarshaldj]

*ping*

[cgbg]

The military is still investigating this one:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1952_Washington,_D.C._UFO_incident

In other news, OJ is still looking for the real killer.

[max americana]

just say it’s a stupid “weather balloon” . It’s worked for 70 years...

[dinodino]

Radar anomalies or testing new tech.

[Openurmind]

Cool, maybe this will wake this place up. :)

[Kozak]

Would not be surprised if it’s a Black Project the Navy doesn’t know about.

[Track9]

Maybe the Navy doesn’t want to confirm to the ruskies/chicoms that they’ve fixed the radar anomalies which produced the ‘sitings’ so they’re going with UFO’s.

[GreenHornet]

They’re only coming here to do the jobs Earth people won’t do.

[dainbramaged]

There are a lot of UFO programs on TV currently - plus the Navy’s recent disclosures may indicate they are preparing us for a big announcement sometime soon. Maybe the simple truth for a change.

[luvbach1]

Not a bombshell. Who didn’t know that they exist?

[minnesota_bound]

I can't quite make out the letters on the ship.....

[SunkenCiv]

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/aatip/index

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3779473/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3762293/posts

[Don Corleone]

Ancient astronaut theorists believe.......

[Bonemaker]

“The Navy has characterized the observed phenomena as ‘unidentified.’”

Well figure it out already....geniuses. Shoot one down or something,

[Born to Conserve]

That IR video is getting the sh!t processed out of it. I guarantee the programmers don’t have any idea what their programs are ultimately doing. The image data is getting rotated, sharpened, filtered, zoomed, shifted left-right-up-down. There is probably extra effort applied to the aim point; the equivalent of our fovia where there are more cones to increase our visual resolution. My guess is there are subroutines that take the data of the aim point, and try desperately to bring out the detail of what is there (if anything). All it would take is for the output of such a subroutine to get fed back and relooped through the stable of filter routines, to make “something” appear. The appearance of such a processing artifact would non-deterministic, and would be impossible to predict or reproduce in testing. This is what we get when we use “artificial intelligence”.

Not a UFO. Not an object at all.