Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Whatever one can say Everett's idea was a boon to Sci-Fi. Usually when talking about the Many-Worlds theory the splitting of the universe(s) is often presented as a clear binary choice. In one universe when you open the box with the Schrodinger it is alive , and in the split off universe it is dead. But most quantum phenomenon are simply binary results but are described by continuous probability distributions; for example shooting electrons through the double slit experiment. From my layman's knowledge, Everett's idea seems to imply there are an infinite number of universes split off when one shoots an electron throw a double slit.
1 posted on 09/12/2019 9:05:16 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: C19fan

Exactly and in the end I think there is something ridiculous about an entirely new universe being created every single time anything happens.

Then again what the heck do I know?


2 posted on 09/12/2019 9:09:35 AM PDT by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

isn’t Everett’s description a description of M-theory?


3 posted on 09/12/2019 9:11:14 AM PDT by txnativegop (The political left, Mankinds intellectual hemlock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

I think all of this indicates that we have a lot to learn about quantum physics.


7 posted on 09/12/2019 9:13:50 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Those is are some portions of theoretical physics that ought to be recognized as more in the area of philosophy than science.

As they so extremely seldom have any practical application to life or living, it is totally fine that most folks either know nothing of them or ignore them.


8 posted on 09/12/2019 9:18:59 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

if “God” is the “observer” of the “universe”.....doesn’t that sort of contain the universe, as it were, in sort of a closed system?

I get the idea of goose/gander (what applies to micro must apply to macro). But if there is an Ideal Observer big enough to observe the whole thing....because He created it...then it would seem that His “observations” are the only ones that matter.....

Berkeley said this a long time ago. (I’ve always found Berkeley not only correct, but sort of unremarkable......)


9 posted on 09/12/2019 9:25:06 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Yawn. Theology masquerading as science.


10 posted on 09/12/2019 9:35:43 AM PDT by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

“...but Bohr’s personal charisma and the desire on the part of scientists to get on with the fun of understanding atoms and particles quickly established Copenhagen as the only way for right-thinking physicists to understand quantum theory.”


I know nothing about quantum mechanics but I do know once scientist all agree on one thing being right and any other opinion is wrong...they stopped being scientist and have become priest.


11 posted on 09/12/2019 9:43:10 AM PDT by CIB-173RDABN (I am not an expert in anything, and my opinion is just that, an opinion. I may be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

In the Unfortunate Feline experiment, a cat is threatened with loss of its 9th life. Dumb experiment, and I don’t accept the conclusion that the “cat is neither alive nor dead until you open the box.” Sorry. They failed with that one.

Other than that, I couldn’t care less if particles at the subatomic level don’t act in a deterministic way.


16 posted on 09/12/2019 10:04:17 AM PDT by I want the USA back (The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. Orwell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
...Everett's idea was a boon to Sci-Fi

I wonder sometimes if Rick Sanchez from the hit cartoon 'Rick and Morty' is based on Hugh Everett . Hugh was so clueless that when his son committed suicide he said he had no idea his son was so sad.

18 posted on 09/12/2019 10:14:31 AM PDT by Nateman (If the left is not screaming, you are doing it wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Theories are just that. Theories. They are not facts. They are not proven. As Einstein said, reality is just a perception but a persistent one.


22 posted on 09/12/2019 10:39:54 AM PDT by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_the_Myriad_Ways

The title story can be read as a response to stories featuring the many-worlds interpretation as a key plot point, by taking the social implications of infinite realities to a depressing conclusion. A police detective, pondering a rash of unexplained suicides and murder-suicides occurring since the discovery of travel to parallel universes, begins to realize that if all possible choices that might be made actually are made in parallel universes, people will see their freedom of choice as meaningless. The choice not to commit suicide, or not to commit a crime, seems meaningless if one knows that in some other universe, the choice went the other way. They therefore kill themselves or commit the crime, because they abandon the sense of choice.


23 posted on 09/12/2019 10:50:18 AM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

The absolute termination of any relationship between philosophy and science.


25 posted on 09/12/2019 12:33:08 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

*ping*


28 posted on 09/12/2019 3:16:48 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Who will think of the gerbils ? Just say no to Buttgiggity !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

“Consciousness, in particular, has nothing to do with it. The ‘observer’ could be an earthworm, a microscope or a rock. There’s not even anything special about macroscopic systems, other than the fact that they can’t help but interact and become entangled with the environment. The price we pay for such a powerful and simple unification of quantum dynamics is a large number of separate worlds.”

Because physics (and even others areas of science) has so far failed to present a viable theory of consciousness, I think this assertion is merely an assumption that has not been supported objectively.

Don Hoffman is a physicist who has put forward a couple of strong theories (and proven theorems) that have so far been supported and not been falsified which support that the construct of space-time, including all of its physical laws, are themselves derived from consciousness. That is, what we observe is not objective reality but merely our interface to it.


29 posted on 09/12/2019 4:45:16 PM PDT by unlearner (War is coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson