Rarely comment but lurk here every day still. I spend little time beyond the trees these days. I was pissed off all day yesterday thinking about how evil the derps are. Also I was pissed at myself. For several years after 9/11 2001 I was angry with my friends who said it was a inside job. I would argue heatedly with them for hours. I’ve apologized to them all now. Yesterday I re-watched vid of building 7 coming down at 5 o’clock that afternoon. I’m amazed that I was EVER stupid enough to believe that could have happened from a fire related to the planes that hit the big towers. I hope many, many folks like me have woke to how utterly stupid they’d have to be to see WTC7 collapse perfectly within its own footprint 8 hours after the twin towers fell and believe that a little fire caused that. I think there was even a time when freepers would be banned for even suggesting something besides the narrative we were fed. I hope that’s no longer the case. I hope enough people are awake. I mean I can see people arguing about what exactly brought down the big towers, but I seriously can’t conceive of anyone with even moderate intelligence buying the WTC7 line of crap. I don’t even need to argue about the twin towers. Watching building 7 is all I need to see to know I’m being lied to. And now this study for the University of Alaska is out, and it is so obvious. Of course the “studies” can only use simulations, cause the derps carted off all the debris fast as they could so nobody could look at that steel.
Oh well, hopefully since this is the Q thread I won’t get banned for having a semi intelligent thought. Thanks for letting me rant. Back to lurk mode.
Great post. Agree completely.
>> many folks like me have woke
Woke. There’s that word!
I’m starting to think that this is another trap that POTUS has laid for the derps. They love to use the word “woke” but I think it is going to boomerang right back on them when people like us describe being “woke”.
Standing ovation from me.
I must say I was surprised by the response from the Q community. It was disappointing.
They even pulled a video of POTUS himself talking about the buildings collapse. It did not fit the narrative.
Of course the “studies” can only use simulations, cause the derps carted off all the debris fast as they could so nobody could look at that steel.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
they got away with the same “disappearing act” at OKC bomb site.
Oh well, hopefully since this is the Q thread I won’t get banned for having a semi intelligent thought. Thanks for letting me rant. Back to lurk mode.
**********************************************
Enjoyed and agreed with your rant. Building #7 convinced
me as well. Thank you.
It’s utterly amazing to me how few people are willing to trust in their own judgement, even when confronted with incontrovertible evidence.
I respect management’s wishes to steer clear of 911 theories, but I wish there were an equally wonderful forum to FR, somewhere, where it could be respectfully discussed amongst intelligent, well-informed friends, much as we discuss Q here.
*** so nobody could look at that steel ***
which steel ? would it have to be certain beams or any beam ?
If you could access it what would one look for ?
you could start at cantigny in wheaton il.
https://www.dailyherald.com/news/20190909/cantigny-to-display-beams-from-world-trade-center
Watching building 7 is all I need to see to know I’m being lied to.
Again, the owner of this site has, on several occasions, stated that he does not want 9/11 Truther postings. Please respect his wishes.