Is it a small first step to restoring faith into our society or is it mere symbolism that will be struck down by a black robed tyrant?
1 posted on
08/08/2019 6:08:48 AM PDT by
buckalfa
To: buckalfa
The 1st Amendment CAN NOT be restricted to a “zone”!!!!
2 posted on
08/08/2019 6:16:02 AM PDT by
G Larry
(There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
To: buckalfa
As long as they are on church property or on private property, they can stay. For example, Christmas manger scenes put up by Christians on their own property or on church property are allowed. They are not allowed on public land.
Christians who complain that their city no longer displays religious Christmas symbols should decorate their front yards with manger scenes. Don’t expect government to be a witness to Jesus.
3 posted on
08/08/2019 6:45:43 AM PDT by
txrefugee
To: upchuck
Bump!
South Carolina ping!
4 posted on
08/08/2019 6:47:01 AM PDT by
Perseverando
(For Progressives, Islamonazis, Statists, Commies & other DemoKKKrats: It's all about PEOPLE CONTROL!)
To: buckalfa
Why did she need the DOT’s permission to sell them to churches and place on churchs’ property?
5 posted on
08/08/2019 9:51:48 AM PDT by
Jemian
(Walls work and Walls Save Lives.)
To: buckalfa
“Is it a small first step to restoring faith into our society or is it mere symbolism that will be struck down by a black robed tyrant?”
No pun itended, but we are praying it is the former.
8 posted on
08/08/2019 1:07:25 PM PDT by
MichaelCorleone
(Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson