To: NorthstarMom
Thing is, if sugar caused cancer, I’d expect cancer rates to be way higher in women than men, because men don’t tend to be such suckers for sugar as women are. Men tend to crave meat and salt. It’s women who are the chocoholics, generally. Yet men are more susceptible to cancer than women are.
38 posted on
08/03/2019 10:51:33 AM PDT by
A_perfect_lady
(FOX has flipped. I am breaking the FOX habit. I have OANN on my Bookmark Bar now. No more FOX.)
To: A_perfect_lady
We dont have the double chromosome coverage women do.
40 posted on
08/03/2019 10:57:14 AM PDT by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: A_perfect_lady
Estimated age-adjusted prevalence of diagnosed diabetes by race/ethnicity and sex among adults aged ≥18 years, United States, 20132015 American Indian/Alaska Native Men: 14.9% Women: 15.3% Asian Men: 9.0% Women: 7.3% Black, non-Hispanic Men: 12.2% Women: 13.2% Hispanic Men: 12.6% Women: 11.7% White, non-Hispanic Men: 8.1% Women: 6.8% Note: Error bars represent upper and lower bounds of the 95% confidence interval. Data source: 20132015 National Health Interview Survey, except American Indian/Alaska Native data, which are from the 2015 Indian Health Service National Data Warehouse.
43 posted on
08/03/2019 11:03:35 AM PDT by
morphing libertarian
( Use Comey's Report, Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
To: A_perfect_lady
In my circle its the opposite. The husbands enjoy generous amounts of desserts at every gathering and even their drinks of choice are sugary. The men never order red wine or whiskey with club soda. Its always something with coke whereas all the wives are careful about their sugar intake. I dislike candy, even chocolate, but my husband loves it.
Thinking about family gatherings, church and fire department potlucks its the same-the men generally eat more sugar than the women.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson