Posted on 07/28/2019 10:32:54 AM PDT by PROCON
Only the sex-obsessed writers at Cosmopolitan could try that line out. There are a lot of ways to try to defend the Clintons, but thats not one.
In the article The Clintons and the Reality of a Long Marriage, the womens magazine attempts to make the case that the Clinton marriage is actually one that everyone should look up to. Apparently, hating philandering men is no longer a part of the feminist agenda. At least, as long as ones wife is running for president.
Bill Cllintons lengthy stroll down memory lane reminded Cosmo writer Ada Calhoun that the Clintons 45-year marriage has outlasted the Gores, the first two Trump marriages, and the first two Gingrich marriages. Wow, rather a low bar. Why not throw in Elizabeth Taylor or Henry VIII?
(Excerpt) Read more at lifenews.com ...
I barely finished the headline before I started projectile vomiting.
My question is is it porn....not to me
Have any of you looked at the models
Some of the verbiage is bordering obscenity but without curse words ....I dont care to be honest but yes 9 year olds dont need to read titles about female orgasms I agree
Publix where I shop btw would suit me to simply not carry it for politics more than....alleged porn
Nobody yet will answer me though
At what level of lack of clothing or cover up is it porn....
I think some folks here think any presentation of women as sexual alluring objects partially clothed is porn
I dont see women twerking on the cover and most are dressed like a nite out clubbing at most
Is this porn to some Freepers?
daughters exclaimed “gross” at a particularly provocative Cosmopolitan cover showing a nearly naked model. The pastor said he happened to glance at his teen-aged son and gross was not what his son was thinking.
As a girl I can say that what the girls thought was gross was the male reaction cosmo intended to elicit
The pastor implies the boys reaction is humorous and harmless
It is not
Sex has a revered place and that is not in the mind of a pubescent boy on a supermarket checkout. If his mother or his sister dressed like that he would object.
More like Caligula and Drusilla.
Are you still talking to me? You lost me at no Im not kidding or something to that effect.
Are you sure this wasn’t published in the BabylonBee; the satire site or maybe the Onion. Another satire site.
I couldn’t agree with you more!
So it is a good thing to stay with a partner who sleeps with others many times over and has been repeatedly accused of Rapt.
We know he enjoyed oral sex from a subordinate while on the job and at work, an incident that would have gotten any of the rest of us fired.
But, according to the left, these are all good things.
As a girl I can say that what the girls thought was gross was the male reaction cosmo intended to elicit
So they even live together?
...for men to buy their mag
Thats not what I meant and you know it
The girls were rejecting the cosmo push for them to read on and learn how to appeal to men by being slutty
For the girls to lower their bar on what is pornographic
The Best!!
It’s like Father Knows Best.
Father knows best how to rape, steal, cheat, lie...
I’m quite serious. You said, “the male reaction cosmo intended to elicit.”
That does not track with girls being the target if cosmo intended to elicit a male reaction.
Not sure why you are arguing about cosmo instructing women on the details of how to behave like sluts but Im done with you as well.
Guys don’t buy cosmo. If girls want to see how to look like sluts, the contents of the mag will tell them how to, also.
Leave us ‘gross’ guys out of it.
This forum never changes
I do not think guys are gross.
I think cosmo is gross as are women who take advantage of guys in a cheap way.
Modesty has a place and a purpose and There is a role for ladies not to be prude but modest and feminine
This is what I try carefully to get across to my middle-school girl students
They are now socialized to think that boys are gross for not ignoring their immodest behavior and dress.
It is the opposite.
And what I hope, as a teacher and a lady, that parents teach their daughters
God created men to be visual. Ladies know this. They find it naturally gross to take advantage of that. Cosmo tried to instruct girls that it is ok to tempt men and get their attention in a sexual way
It is not.
My assertion is that it is cosmo and slutty women that are gross
Perhaps I should say cosmo is pornography for women.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.