Posted on 07/28/2019 7:09:17 AM PDT by Steve1999
President Donald Trump shifted his attacks Sunday from Rep. Elijah Cummings for failing Baltimore to Speaker Nancy Pelosi for failing San Francisco. “Speaking of failing badly, has anyone seen what is happening to Nancy Pelosi’s district in San Francisco.” Trump wrote on Twitter. “It is not even recognizable lately. Something must be done before it is too late.” Enraged Democrats on Saturday condemned Trump’s criticism of Cummings as “racist” after the president described Cummings’ district in Baltimore as a “disgusting, rat and rodent-infested mess.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Can you read? It seems legible to me. It is conditional thus the use of the word IF I vote for results not rallies, tweets, and promises. Both of these were easily accomplished in four years as I pointed out and you made fun of.
I had other issues that he does well on., If NK is actually dismantling that would be a big achievement. The economy is an A+ But the tweets and the rallies are just propaganda and noise.
I won’t waist my vote on an open border non-law and order president who lets high ranking political criminals go without justice..
That is PERFECT!!!!!
I agree.
And he’s got plenty of material to work with, too, all handed to him by the dems themselves.
Did you mean waste?
So yes or no, you might not vote for Trump?
I already said what trump would have to fo rot get my vote. Now you keep asking the same question. my vote is not up for grabs based on tweets, rallies, and promises and name calling other candidates. it is based on results. I don’t vote for a disappointment for a second term.
Now does that answer your question.
Why would you blindly vote for someone a second time if they failed in major promises when they had the power to keep them? That is the fallacy of your position rewarding someone who can’t or won’t do what they say..
Still no answer? Would you vote for Trump today, yes or no?
NO NO NO NO for the reasons I stated. He has two major failures and in 28 months has done nothing about them.
Now mister interrogator how do you justify voting for a person who fails on major campaign promises? It is you who has some splainin to do. I have already given my reasons 4 times.,
your reading comprehension is weak.
You see my answer is the same today as it would be at the election, as I stated a few times. The difference is he has till 2020 November to keep his promises and win my vote; whereas you are satisfied with leaving the border pourous and criminals walking around and flaunting their freedom, even throwing it in his face.
Burr only recently began his investigations.....I suspect you’ll wait until he has all the ducks in a row to bring charges?
The absence of investigative action against Hillary post-presidential election, despite promises to the contrary, is evidence elitist ‘Republicans’ prefer Hillary Clinton right where she is at...unless Barr finds otherwise in his investigations.
No equal justice. No rule of law
According to George Washington University law professor Randall Elias....” anything Hillary did ‘as Secretary of State’ was more than five years ago, the general federal statute of limitations is five years. Trump can’t prosecute Clinton now, even if they wanted to.”
Would you vote for Trump if the election was today? It’s a yes or no answer.
My God what’s wrong with you. Read 47 and leave me the F alone.
I'm with you! Trump is not 100% perfect! That means I cannot vote for him! From now on, I shall write in Jesus of Nazareth.
Coup attempt based on phony information not five years old. Comes report findings not 5 years old, Does treason have a statute of limitations? Washing uranium through a campaign contributor to Russia and having her foundation benefit and her husband’s speaking fee double in Russia.
The foundation issues are not all 5 years old. He called her a criminal for 16 months and now he’s been in office 29. He is letting her go from his inaction. That is unforgivable.
Lastly have the investigation of the old charges and publish the finding for historical record.
You'll have to stick with Trump.
-PJ
Not a thing wrong with me, it's you who spend time with us Trump supporters while supporting his political opponents.
So who's at the top of your list right now? Or will you sit out the 2020 election?
Or do you think there's a dark horse out there that we haven't heard about yet?
-PJ
We shall see as Barr goes forward with these investigations...including the Clinton Foundation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.