I might add the Fake Derp Media to that mix, Texy. 'Knowingly' shows intent, which is an element of many, if not most, criminal laws.
And, as Q has pointed out, with what was it? Treason, sedition? Something bad.
From #3507:
“...Why paint a narrative that the one item you cannot possess is the one item you need in order to justify your argument?
People elected ‘knowingly’ spreading false-information [disinformation]? ...”
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Here is a use by Q of the word “KNOWINGLY” in connection not only with Schiff, as in #3485, but also, it would seem, the democrats in Congress who are insisting on the current narrative they are pursuing.
Sorry for the double post - internet troubles - very slow here.
Signing off for a time!
I might add the Fake Derp Media to that mix, Texy. 'Knowingly' shows intent, which is an element of many, if not most, criminal laws.
And, as Q has pointed out, with what was it? Treason, sedition? Something bad.
Like our Q team says, they knowingly cannot have what they desire, or purport to want, or really just want to create another stupid listeners moment.