Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Chevy Created the 2020 Mid-Engine Corvette
www.popularmechanics.com ^ | Jul 19, 2019 | By Ezra Dyer

Posted on 07/23/2019 8:29:34 AM PDT by Red Badger

Engine: 6.2-liter V8, 495 hp and 470 lb-ft of torque (with performance exhaust) / Transmission: Eight-speed dual-clutch / 0-60: less than 3 seconds, with launch control /Wheelbase: 107.2 inches / Dry Weight: 3,366 pounds / Tires (Z51 package): Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, 245/35/ZR19 front, 305/30/ZR20 rear / Cargo volume: 12.6 cubic feet / Brakes (Z51): 13.3-inch front, 13.8-inch rear, Brembo monobloc calipers / Base Price: Less than $60,000. But probably not much less.

======================================================================

About four and a half years ago, I drove the then-new Corvette Z06 at a track in Nevada. With 650 horsepower, the Z06’s rear tires struggled to cope with a firestorm of torque dispatched by the massive V8 sitting out ahead of the cockpit. For all its superlative capabilities, the Z06 needed more traction, more weight on the rear end. I told Tadge Juechter, Corvette executive chief engineer, “I think to do any better than this, you need to go mid-engine.”

He assumed a look of weary annoyance and replied, “Yeah, that’s what everyone keeps telling me.” Which, you’ll note, was not a denial.

Juechter had a good poker face, because back in Michigan, he and a team of engineers had been working on such a car since 2013. Disguised to look like a mutant Australian pickup truck, it was code-named Blackjack. Under its Holden bodywork, Blackjack was teaching GM how to build a whole new kind of Corvette.

With the mid-engine Corvette finally upon us, I kept thinking about that first rough-hewn test car, which was caught by a spy photographer soon after I drove the Z06. What happened since then? And how did we get from that freaky one-off development car to a production Corvette?

I asked GM whether they still had Blackjack and any other vehicles from the development pipeline—physical snapshots of where they were years ago, cars that show what kind of obstacles they overcame on the way to the polished end product. In the case of a normal mass-market car, GM probably wouldn’t have retained a fossil record of its development. But the mid-engine design is the biggest deal since the Corvette got a V8 in 1955, so GM had the foresight to keep some development cars around. They agreed to convene four of those cars and four key engineers in one room so we could retrace the path that led to the 2020 C8 Corvette.

Blackjack is the oddball. Three of the Corvettes in the garage at GM’s Milford Proving Grounds look reasonably Corvette-like, inasmuch as I can judge their appearance through various degrees of camouflage. But Blackjack wears a pugnacious Holden front end grafted to a C7 cabin that leads to the suggestion of a pickup bed. The bizarre aesthetic points to the first challenge for the team, which was keeping the damn thing a secret.

“Before, we could disguise development work by tweaking a current car,” says Juechter. “You can’t do that with mid-engine proportions, so we decided to make it look like a ute.”

Secrecy was paramount. At GM’s Advanced Vehicle Integration facility in Warren, Michigan, the company built a special room for the C8 with restricted swipe-card access. “If you talk to people at GM, their memory of this car is that it’s the car nobody would let them see,” says Alex MacDonald, Corvette vehicle performance manager. The team used spotters to watch for helicopters, speeding back to a secret garage called The Lair when there was a threat of aerial photography.

At this stage, all that mattered was the basic structure and suspension geometry, the foundation of the car.

“If you look at the wing,” says Juechter, “it’s on upside down. That’s because aerodynamics come into play on suspension development at relatively low speeds, and this front end had a ton of lift. So to get the pitch right, we inverted the wing to add lift to the rear.”

Blackjack’s interior is racecar-crude, its transmission an adapted PDK from a Porsche. But the foundation—structure and suspension—was crucial, determining everything that happened next.

“We knew we only had one chance to get this right,” says Juechter. “Computer models get us in the ballpark, but we have to build hardware so we can learn.”

Among the things they learned is that no supplier on the planet had the high-pressure die capacity to handle the big pieces of the C8’s front and rear structure. For Blackjack, they milled those parts from solid aluminum—7,000 pounds of metal to produce 400 pounds of components. You can do that when you’re buildingone car. But you also need to consider how you’re going to build thousands of cars.

So, the team worked out plans to make their structural dreams feasible by producing those parts in-house. In the meantime, they had to keep testing. The car next to Blackjack is a mule from 2016. This one has the correct dry-sump V8, the correct GM-developed 8-speed dual-clutch transmission, and the next-gen electrical architecture of the production car. But it’s still one of a dozen cars largely hand-built and still showing elements of improv.

“You still see some C7 structure here, where we could use it,” says Juechter. “Like the doors. One thing that’s really challenging is sealing. You’re going to be testing in the rain, the car needs to be sealed.”

Hence the bits of C7 cabin. But the body structure underneath is real C8.

While these 12 cars were running around Milford, other C8 parts were being tested on current Corvettes—the steering wheel, for instance. Kim Lind, the team’s additive design and manufacturing product application engineer, produced 3D-printed prototype steering wheels—a feat made possible by fusion deposition modeling.

“The wheel was a case where we just had to try it out, live with it and see what we thought,” says Mike Petrucci, Corvette lead development engineer. The final design, the so-called “squircle,” allows a clear view of the new dash display and went through countless iterations before it was finalized.

“It gets down to millimeter by millimeter,” says Juechter. “That’s just the wheel. There are literally a million decisions on the way to making a new car.”

And those decisions get more complex when you move to the integration vehicle phase, represented by the third car in the garage. This is the point where everything has to be production-ready.

And so: They build it.

Over two weeks, throngs of engineers bring in their parts—or 3D-printed facsimiles thereof—and build the first C8 from the ground up, the world’s most complicated IKEA project. There’s no instruction manual. Along the way, they cataloged 400 issues that needed to be addressed to make the car possible for the production line.

"We're learning things like whether there's hand space for the worker on the line to install a particular part." says Juechter. "It's Engineer A didn't talk to Engineer B, that sort of thing."

The integration vehicles are also where the team addresses small details, from stuff you just expect to work, like the fuel gauge, to subjective topics, like shift quality. “We’re tuning on the racetrack,” says Petrucci. “You’re taking a pile of parts and turning them into a Corvette.”

And that pre-production Corvette sits 10 feet away. They just got this car from the Bowling Green factory two months ago, and the interior is still mostly camouflaged. It seems like the car is done, but not quite.

“When you’re used to driving these development vehicles and get into one of these from the production line, it’s different,” says MacDonald. “And you go, OK, why? It’s all the same parts. But it’s balanced differently on the track, the ride and handling has subtly changed. So you figure out what changed and what you need to do to get it back where you want it.”

They’ve got some time—the C8 isn’t slated for production until the end of the year. But given what I’ve seen, I can’t help but wonder: What are they working on next?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet; History; Hobbies
KEYWORDS: automotive; chevy; corvette
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
Lots of developmental pics at link......................
1 posted on 07/23/2019 8:29:34 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Btt waited for this coolness since they announced. Fun to dream about.
Probably still slap a fuel injector on a C3 or get the fuel injected model instead.
Hubby disagrees. Fun discussion among car crazy couples.


2 posted on 07/23/2019 8:34:41 AM PDT by momincombatboots (Do you know anyone who isnÂ’t a socialist after 65? Freedom exchanged cash, a medicare card control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

IMHO, designers made the body work too busy and gave it a really ugly ass end. The truth about handling and performance will make itself known in the near future, reliability somewhat later. I am thinking this may be more a Lambo/Ferrari wannabee muscle car than a pure sports car.


3 posted on 07/23/2019 8:43:13 AM PDT by pt17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pt17

I’ve had two ‘vettes (’67 427 couple & 2005 C6). Both were reliable, well built, and a blast to drive.

I’m now a truck guy, but that mid-engined one is a beaut - with one exception.

Note to GM, you could lose that lego rear end and rethink it.


4 posted on 07/23/2019 8:45:06 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots; pt17

What’s underneath is what really counts. That ‘body’ looks horrid...................


5 posted on 07/23/2019 8:47:01 AM PDT by Red Badger (Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots; pt17

What’s underneath is what really counts. That ‘body’ looks horrid...................


6 posted on 07/23/2019 8:47:04 AM PDT by Red Badger (Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote
Note to GM, you could lose that lego rear end and rethink it.

It looks like a Camaro that got rear ended.................

7 posted on 07/23/2019 8:48:30 AM PDT by Red Badger (Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Only thing that excited me in car world in ages. I miss the days of the old Hemi Barracuda. This is a Corvette that I could actually afford.


8 posted on 07/23/2019 8:48:50 AM PDT by Spacetrucker (George Washington didn't use his freedom of speech to defeat the British - HE SHOT THEM .. WITH GUNS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

9 posted on 07/23/2019 8:49:21 AM PDT by Red Badger (Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The Z models price up to $125k.

And produce 1,000 hp. And top out at 250mph.

Million dollar performance for $125k.


10 posted on 07/23/2019 8:49:58 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

For all effective purposes, “mid engine” here means rear engine. The weight is over the drive wheels, which is the primary benefit, and it’s all behind the driver. So, technically it’s not behind the axle, or whatever reason they’re using not to call it rear engine. Am I wrong about this. Either way, I bet it feels amazing to drive, and not just because of the additional traction, if the center of gravity is improved.


11 posted on 07/23/2019 8:50:56 AM PDT by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Wait until you see the new Camaro. I know the company that makes some of the parts to both autos.

It looks like a Camaro that got rear ended.................


12 posted on 07/23/2019 8:51:04 AM PDT by Dacula
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I dunno.. it has some C7 meaness to it. I do love the C7. But a mid engine, well he k, it’s like you said, that’s what counts.
I have never even driven a mid engine.
Give it a year or two and see what does/doesnt work.


13 posted on 07/23/2019 8:52:36 AM PDT by momincombatboots (Do you know anyone who isnÂ’t a socialist after 65? Freedom exchanged cash, a medicare card control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: z3n

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-engine_design


14 posted on 07/23/2019 8:52:54 AM PDT by Red Badger (Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Looks good. Much better than current car. Rear end does looks cluttered.

Still GM however. I consider them stolen property until bondholders are repaid.


15 posted on 07/23/2019 8:53:21 AM PDT by alternatives? (Why have an army if there are no borders?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dacula
I agree. My first impression of the new Corvette was “That's a Camero?!”
16 posted on 07/23/2019 8:55:15 AM PDT by llevrok (Vote, while it is still legal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots
Had a Fiat X1/9 back in the day, mid-engine design. Fun to the max to drive!...............
17 posted on 07/23/2019 8:55:30 AM PDT by Red Badger (Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Is it under the seat in this vette?

I didn’t read that.
A truly centered engine would handle a hell of a lot better than arse heavy


18 posted on 07/23/2019 8:59:44 AM PDT by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: z3n

What u talking bout Willis? The engine is in front of the rear axle, hence, mid engine.


19 posted on 07/23/2019 9:00:04 AM PDT by crosdaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: z3n

In between the rear drive wheels............


20 posted on 07/23/2019 9:03:06 AM PDT by Red Badger (Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson