https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Swigert#Death
Many countries including France, Japan, and China consider “low” dose radiation to actually be beneficial at preventing disease and improving lifespan. Its called hormesis and it has been studied in people who live with high background radiation levels such as the area near Chernobyl. The US subscribes to the Linear No Threshold (LNT) theory that maintains if high doses are bad then there is no lowest dose that can be good. Maybe space travel research will help settle the issue. The low gravity environment is a bigger problem for biological systems. Blood clotting is disrupted and several types of antibiotics seem to be less effective in space so disease may be a greater risk than the radiation.
But does it give them any super-powers?
Only 24 astronauts have been beyond Low Earth Orbit (LEO), outside of the protective shield of Earth’s magnetic sphere.
Radiation is far, far worse out there.
good then i wanna get all my X-Rays, pet scans, cat scans etc done in outer space from here on out
Good point.
He had a lot of time, up there.
High doses of most anything are bad. Take water, for instance. It is essential for life, but can also kill, in high enough doses. There is increasing evidence that the evil "nuclear radiation" is simply not a killer in low doses. In Hiroshima, and Nagasaki, the rates of cancer in residents who survived the initial blast and radiation was actually lower (though statistically insignificant) than the population of Japan as a whole.
The fear of radiation, in my opinion, is vastly overrated.
These numbers are for Mercury/Gemini/Apollo program astronauts (and excluding Edgar Mitchell, who died after the numbers were tabulated).
Death related to cardiovascular disease for the astronauts who never flew was 9%.
For those who only flew orbitally (which was lower altitude than the ISS) or sub-orbitally was 11%.
For the 24 men who went to the moon, it was 43%.
https://observer.com/2016/07/space-radiation-devastated-the-lives-of-apollo-astronauts/