Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study probes how to tell elderly patients not to bother with cancer screening
Medical XPress ^ | July 2, 2019 | Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Posted on 07/05/2019 8:20:57 AM PDT by ConservativeMind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: SecondAmendment

Absolutely! They are considered the Elite. It is the peons and serfs they are out to eliminate.


21 posted on 07/05/2019 8:37:20 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

In 10 years (3 if we have a democrat president) the question will be: “What kind of music do you want to hear during your Life Exit Procedure?”


22 posted on 07/05/2019 8:37:42 AM PDT by I want the USA back (The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. Orwell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

I’ve seen the warning signs developing for years now. We are rapidly approaching a time when the government will say “well you’ve reached the end of your useful life, you are a burden on the rest of society. It’s your duty to take these pills and die.”

They want us disarmed for this, as they know there are a lot who “won’t go gentle into that good night.”

I’ve seen quite a few in the millennial crowd say things like “everyone over age 75 should be put down, they don’t contribute anything.”

Do you think for a second that the think for the moment, “it’s all
About ME” generation won’t gladly adopt government policies like this?

Doctors are already refusing to treat people at a certain “stage” of illness and dumping them in hospice where they can be ODed on morphine.

Now they are talking about refusing certain care options for the old.

This is what devaluing human life brings.

So it’s here, how do we get ahead of it, if we know where this ends? Why does our side always fight the battle when the mandated killing starts and it is engrained in the society, rather than predicting that 10 or 15 years from now the mandated killing will start are getting ahead of it before it becomes an entrenched policy.

If we had pushed a marriage amendment in 1996, rather than in 2004, we could have had it. We are always 10 years late to the battle.


23 posted on 07/05/2019 8:38:12 AM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bonemaker

nailed it


24 posted on 07/05/2019 8:38:25 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

You are right. 10-15 years. So how do we get ahead of
It NOW.


25 posted on 07/05/2019 8:38:46 AM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

They want to get rid of us OLD FOLK to make way for YOUNG ILLEGAL FOLK.


26 posted on 07/05/2019 8:39:45 AM PDT by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord. (Psalm 32:12))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat
I’m sure our Congress critters and other elites will be getting the same advice and treatment?

ROTFLMAO

27 posted on 07/05/2019 8:39:54 AM PDT by GOPJ (Democrat "a party that makes. Americans feel like strangers in their own country. NYT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Odds are good that one of the married couple will live into their 90’s. Makes sense to continue doctor appointments into your 90’s as well.

The Dems are preparing for single payor, and when you inevitably ration healthcare then people in their 70’s and 80’s will be discouraged from seeking preventative screenings.


28 posted on 07/05/2019 8:39:55 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

This is preposterous. They are just trying to save Medicare $.

If people don’t get screened, don’t get treatment, just hurry up and die, it saves Medicare $.


29 posted on 07/05/2019 8:42:36 AM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
"For doctors, talking to a patient about the idea that they’ve “aged out” of cancer screening can be a challenging conversation"

Have they decided to get the quacks to stop talking to you about your vast gun collections?

30 posted on 07/05/2019 8:42:51 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mercat

I am 86 and stopped all cancer screening 4/5 years ago. It was my decision,the doctor did not suggest it.


31 posted on 07/05/2019 8:43:33 AM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone
chet99 and others of his ilk are no longer with us. Differences of opinion about Sarah Palin with Jim Rob got them their walking papers. Along with the “ You don't have to go home, but you can't stay here” message.
32 posted on 07/05/2019 8:43:51 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

I noticed that right after Obamacare was introduced, these studies were starting to conclude that it is not worth doing testing or treatments.

Of course that all saves money and if people hurry up and die, that saves even more money.


33 posted on 07/05/2019 8:47:25 AM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

As a 40-something this really doesn’t affect me but WTF????

“They’re old anyway so let’s just let them die to save a few bucks”?????

That’s a sickening mentality. It’s one thing if the person has a terminal condition and won’t benefit from the medical treatment but to just write them off and not bother screening is incomprehensible. That cheapens human life.


34 posted on 07/05/2019 8:49:59 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sport

Chet99 did all those dog bite threads.

That got old, years before he left.


35 posted on 07/05/2019 8:50:28 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

There’s already some rationing after a certain age.

A friend was treated for cancer many years ago and had a follow up check every five years thereafter, covered by insurance/Medicare.

These checks ceased to be paid by Medicare once he turned 80.


36 posted on 07/05/2019 8:54:36 AM PDT by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mercat

Have you lost your baby teeth yet?


37 posted on 07/05/2019 9:02:23 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
...the screening methods also come with a cost; the U.S. health care system spends an estimated $7.8 billion on mammograms each year.

And there it is, buried pretty deep. They want to find a way to tell people nicely that they are better off dead than spending insurance company of government money. Eventually the government won't worry about the "nicely" part and they will just be told: no health care for you, grey hair!

38 posted on 07/05/2019 9:04:29 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

SOYLENT Green,,,


39 posted on 07/05/2019 9:10:52 AM PDT by Big Red Badger (Despised by the Despicable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

When insurance cos tell people they won’t finance a treatment people go nuts. What will happen when its the government saying it? It’s what I’ve never understood about the NHS and how popular it is even though they don’t have nearly the degree of care Americans demand from private insurance olans


40 posted on 07/05/2019 9:12:16 AM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson