Replies

I’ve seen the warning signs developing for years now. We are rapidly approaching a time when the government will say “well you’ve reached the end of your useful life, you are a burden on the rest of society. It’s your duty to take these pills and die.”

They want us disarmed for this, as they know there are a lot who “won’t go gentle into that good night.”

I’ve seen quite a few in the millennial crowd say things like “everyone over age 75 should be put down, they don’t contribute anything.”

Do you think for a second that the think for the moment, “it’s all
About ME” generation won’t gladly adopt government policies like this?

Doctors are already refusing to treat people at a certain “stage” of illness and dumping them in hospice where they can be ODed on morphine.

Now they are talking about refusing certain care options for the old.

This is what devaluing human life brings.

So it’s here, how do we get ahead of it, if we know where this ends? Why does our side always fight the battle when the mandated killing starts and it is engrained in the society, rather than predicting that 10 or 15 years from now the mandated killing will start are getting ahead of it before it becomes an entrenched policy.

If we had pushed a marriage amendment in 1996, rather than in 2004, we could have had it. We are always 10 years late to the battle.

I’ve seen quite a few in the millennial crowd say things like “everyone over age 75 should be put down, they don’t contribute anything.”

As a millennial, I've heard a lot of similar comments. And when you add the irrational hatred for baby boomers that many millennials have, it becomes clear that they will have no problem killing people en masse in ten+ years.

And before anyone says that they'll grow out of it, it should be pointed out that it's one thing to hold such views when you're a rebellious teenager or college student. It's quite another when you're in your mid 20s to 30s. (The oldest millennials are even approaching late 30s now.) Point is, for the most part, my generation is NOT growing out of its childish, leftist views. There are dark times ahead unless we act now.

So it’s here, how do we get ahead of it, if we know where this ends? Why does our side always fight the battle when the mandated killing starts and it is engrained in the society, rather than predicting that 10 or 15 years from now the mandated killing will start are getting ahead of it before it becomes an entrenched policy.

Because when we talked about it here 15 years ago we were considered bat crazy.

One could see this coming at least 20 years ago with Peter Singer becoming the professor of Ethics at Princeton.