I like the guy but not the position... enough with the Czars! Work within the federal structure.
“Work within the federal structure.”
Why? It’s a mess.
ROAD BLOCK in CONGRESS. Detour. Go around.
Whatever it takes to get control of the illegal alien inundation......
>Work within the federal structure.
“Federal structure” = “Deep State”
Back in November 2016, I posted this:
__________________________________________________
Thanks for the link. I just sent them this:
You know how the democrats just LOVE those czars?
How about a civil rights czar.
This person would simply go city by city, county by county, state by state, ordinance by ordinance and law by law.
Putting every firearm law under extreme scrutiny, fast track ‘em into the courts, and remove them all. Including federal firearms law like NFA 1934, the GCA 1968, and the Hughes Amendment of 1986.
Also, tax credits for all concealed carrying Americans to offset the expense of crimes prevented. $200 every 2 years.
8 posted on 11/12/2016, 11:50:06 AM by RandallFlagg (Vote for your guns!)
____________________________________________________
I still believe that we should have had this from the start.
You’ll see....he just set up the media with that word.
“Work within the federal structure”.
The “Federal structure” is Deep State. They’d oppose him every inch of the way.
He’s a liason...nothing wrong with that.
Trump is trying to protect the border and stop illegal immigration. He was stopped at every turn. He ran out of options. In the meantime real people still wanted him to do something.
Now he is trying this. I hope it works.
Oh good grief.
Is this your first day in America?
I agree with you. In the early days of the republic people were concerned about republic form, ie, trappings, titles or actions that seemed too regal. It may seem like not a big deal, but the way we think about how we’re governed is the foundation for how we ARE governed. The first czar was the “Energy Czar” in the 70s. By definition the term invokes undemocratic governance, and it should not be used.. And don’t even get me started on this “Gang of this or that number” usage to describe
Small political coalitions. Given how that term came to be, the Gang of Four show prosecution in China, its adoption into our political language is just bizarre
You mean the one that ignores Presidential Orders and Directives, that one?