SCOTUS will ultimately decide.
What is YOUR opinion?
Arguably, it already did.
In Miller, weapons that have a military use are in the scope of the 2nd amendment. All Circuit Courts interpret Miller for the opposite of what it says, and SCOTUS, given may oppotunities to correct the Circuits, is fine with what the Circuit Courts read Miller for..
In Heller, arms and devices that have been banned a long time, ergo "not in common civilian use," the ban is constitutional. This was done so that bans on military arms (in particular, the M-16 and others banned by 1986 Act) would stand.
On the 2nd amendment, the courts are full of garbage. But, they have the government behind them so, like the Mafia, I'll do whatever they say, otherwise they will kill me. Has nothing to do with "right and wrong," or "rule of law." It's law of the jungle, and the government abhors power to the people.
I don’t care what the black robed tyrants have to say on the matter.
I can read, and shall not be infringed is pretty clear. There is no “except for these weapons” in there.
Our rights will be decided on by tyrants in black robes. I'm overjoyed /sarc
SCOTUS does not have the constitutional authority to decide what is constitutional. They grabbed that power in the early 1800’s and Congress let them get away with it.