NO justifiable first-principles reason WHY
re: “The premise you unsuccessfully tried to smuggle
in is that science is concerned with WHY. WHY
presumes motivation, and there are none. Science
is interested in HOW.
QM can’t say HOW either.
The ‘why’ would be the same thing in my book.
QM fails in providing any rationale for the so-called ‘ground state’ being what it is; the point you missed, for the pleasure of a ride on the ‘hobby horse’ you just rode in on.