Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Swapping water for CO2 could make fracking greener and more effective
Phys.org ^ | May 30, 2019 | Cell Press

Posted on 06/01/2019 8:37:47 PM PDT by ETL

Scientists at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and China University of Petroleum (Beijing) have demonstrated that CO2 may make a better hydraulic fracturing (fracking) fluid than water.

Their research, published May 30 in the journal Joule, could help pave the way for a more eco-friendly form of fracking that would double as a mechanism for storing captured atmospheric CO2.

Fracking is a technique used to extract resources from unconventional reservoirs in which fluid (usually water mixed with sand, foaming agents, biocides, and other chemicals) is injected into the rock, fracturing it to release the resources within.

Of the approximately 7-15 million liters of fluid injected, 30%-50% remains in the after extraction ends.

Its high water consumption, , and frequent production issues have led to concerns about fracking among both industry experts and environmental advocates.

"Non-aqueous fracturing could be a potential solution to circumvent these issues," says Nannan Sun, a researcher in the Shanghai Advanced Research Institute at the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

"We chose CO2 fracturing from a range of options because the process includes multiple benefits.

However, we were still lacking a fundamental understanding of the technology, which is greatly important for its further development and deployment."

Benefits of CO2 fracturing include eliminating the need for a hefty water supply (which would make fracking viable in arid locations), reducing the risk of damage to reservoirs (as often happens when aqueous solutions create blockages in the rock formation), and providing an underground repository for captured CO2.

However, CO2 is not likely to become commonly used as a fracking fluid unless it is more effective than water at resource production.

To investigate the differences between CO2 and water as fracturing fluids on a , Sun and his team collected shale outcrops from Chongqing, China and fractured them with both fluids.

They found that CO2 outperformed water, creating complex networks of with significantly higher stimulated volumes.

"We demonstrated that CO2 has higher mobility than , and, therefore, the injection pressure can be better delivered into the natural porosity of the formation," says Sun.

"This changes the mechanism by which the fractures are created, generating more complex fracture networks that result in more efficient shale gas production."

While the researchers believe this hydraulic fracturing technology will be scalable, its large-scale development is currently limited by CO2 availability.

The cost of CO2 captured from emission sources is still prohibitively expensive to make CO2 an industry-wide fluid replacement.

The team also notes that once CO2 has been injected into the fracture, it acquires a low viscosity that inhibits it from effectively transporting sand to the fractures.

Since the sand is intended to prop open the fractures while shale gas is harvested, it is critical that scientists learn to improve the fluid's viscosity—but the team is not yet sure how to do so while keeping costs low and minimizing the environmental footprint.

As next steps, the researchers plan to study the limits of CO2 fracturing technology in order to better understand how it can be used.

"Further investigations are needed to identify the effects of type of reservoirs, geomechanical properties and conditions, CO2 sensitivity of the formation, and so forth," says Sun.

"Additionally, cooperation with industries will be carried out to push forward the practical deployment of the technology."


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Science
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Free in Texas

I didn’t even realize it had a liquid form. I thought at ordinary temperatures and pressures it went from gas to dry ice.


21 posted on 06/02/2019 7:22:56 AM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Parmy

Good Visual!!


22 posted on 06/02/2019 8:23:11 AM PDT by Parmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: scrabblehack

Decaffeinate coffee and some cleaning processes use liquid CO2.


23 posted on 06/02/2019 7:00:05 PM PDT by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: scrabblehack
I didn’t even realize it had a liquid form.

Look behind your favorite fast food joint, you may see a 5-ft tall dewar labeled "carbon dioxide". That's liquid CO2 for the soda fountain.

24 posted on 06/02/2019 7:07:04 PM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: scrabblehack
Phase diagram for CO2


25 posted on 06/02/2019 7:12:58 PM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Deaf Smith
I had a good friend that worked on an Air rig. Said you could see the dust cloud for miles. Sounded crazy as hell to me but I have seen some water well/rat hole rigs that used air.

These guys used to go out on a location and drill 40 feet or so. That way you could say you'd started drilling. Also it was handy on a rocky location to have then drill the rat hole and mouse hole ahead of time.

26 posted on 06/02/2019 8:18:31 PM PDT by Free in Texas (Celebrate diversity. Own firearms of every caliber.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Free in Texas
Yes, could be seen for miles.

Drill bit generated heat, pumped air was the oxygen supply. Hit your hydrocarbons and there would be a furnace downhole.

27 posted on 06/03/2019 3:38:50 AM PDT by Deaf Smith (When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's fore sure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson