Skip to comments.
NASA executive hired to lead 2024 moon mission quits after 6 weeks
theweek.com ^
Posted on 05/24/2019 1:17:50 PM PDT by BenLurkin
Sirangelo has resigned, and Reuters reports that his "ouster was sealed by increasing skepticism that 2024 was a realistic deadline for moon landings."
This also comes after a proposal from NASA to create a separate directorate for lunar missions was rejected by lawmakers. Bridenstine said on Thursday that "given NASA is no longer pursuing the new mission directorate, Mark has opted to pursue other opportunities."
(Excerpt) Read more at theweek.com ...
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 2024; apollo; elonmusk; falcon9; falconheavy; marksirangelo; moon; nasa; spacex; themoon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
1
posted on
05/24/2019 1:17:50 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
Is the muslim outreach still #1 priority?
2
posted on
05/24/2019 1:19:32 PM PDT
by
2banana
(My common ground with islamic terrorists - they want to die for allah and we want to kill them.)
To: BenLurkin
We have zero shot at the Moon by 2024.
You would need to be doing test flights now on the lander and they haven’t even done test launches on the Orion full stack.
I don’t even think they have a design for the lander yet.
3
posted on
05/24/2019 1:21:41 PM PDT
by
Zathras
To: BenLurkin
We don’t even have a launch vehicle, how are we supposed to get to the Moon in 2024?
4
posted on
05/24/2019 1:22:34 PM PDT
by
Shadow44
To: BenLurkin
It’s stupid to spend money going back to the moon when it is still questionable if we will have a country!
5
posted on
05/24/2019 1:22:40 PM PDT
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
To: BenLurkin
Land on the Boondoggle by 2024!
6
posted on
05/24/2019 1:26:47 PM PDT
by
SpaceBar
To: Zathras
Just use the old one.
Worked perfectly.
7
posted on
05/24/2019 1:27:15 PM PDT
by
chris37
(Monday, March 25 2019 is Maga Day!)
To: BenLurkin
Blue Origin might be there before 2024
To: BenLurkin
Not to worry. ocasio cortez has the plans for an elevator to the moon.
To: Zathras
I agree. If they pull it off by 2024 it will be too too much of “see we said we could do it” and too too little of a robust mission it could be.
I think the original date was 2028. We could do lots of robotics exploration and exploration prep with them between 2024 and 2028, including preposition of material at the 2028 landing site ahead of time. Carrying and careing for humans takes a lot more weight and a lot more planning & preparation.
10
posted on
05/24/2019 1:33:29 PM PDT
by
Wuli
To: rktman
11
posted on
05/24/2019 1:34:08 PM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: Zathras
How long did it take us in the 60s and with old technology.
12
posted on
05/24/2019 1:35:07 PM PDT
by
dhs12345
To: Shadow44
We dont even have a launch vehicle, how are we supposed to get to the Moon in 2024?Its that SLS, a monster booster, but it keeps being delayed. Was supposed to have flown first a couple of years ago, now they are HOPING to try it next year.
I believe they have announced their plans to use commercial launchers to reach the moon, and Elon is grinning widely.
13
posted on
05/24/2019 1:39:10 PM PDT
by
Paradox
(Don't call them mainstream, there is nothing mainstream about the MSM.)
To: BenLurkin
Saying they will do it by 2028 is like saying forgetaboutit, because of politics. The only chance to get it done is during the term of a president who proposes it, whether it’s 4 or 8 years. At least that’s how it seems to be in my view.
14
posted on
05/24/2019 1:39:44 PM PDT
by
wattsgnu
To: dhs12345
Kennedy's inauguration address would have been January 24, 1961 so the first landing in July 1069 was 8 1/2 years later. But, there was a lot of work done before Kennedy's speech. And this was a different country then. More get it done and less get the paperwork done first.
On the other hand, it would be nice to see it happen during President Trump's second term.....
15
posted on
05/24/2019 1:41:55 PM PDT
by
Bernard
(We will stop calling you fake news when you stop being fake news.)
To: Lurkinanloomin
Its stupid to spend money going back to the moon ...
I couldn't agree more. In fact, NASA and the Depts of Education and Energy should be abolished.
16
posted on
05/24/2019 1:41:58 PM PDT
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: dhs12345
[How long did it take us in the 60s and with old technology.]
The NASA budget in the 1960’s was pretty much devoted to space. Today, we’ve got climate research and a bunch of other irrelevant things in there. I bet they also have race and gender quotas reducing the number of people who actually do things other than push paper. And the annual budgets for the moonshot era were 50% to 100% higher than today’s number in inflation-adjusted terms.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budget_of_NASA
17
posted on
05/24/2019 2:00:26 PM PDT
by
Zhang Fei
(My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
To: Wuli
Yeah, this ain't 1961 and there ain't no Cold War supremacy mounting involved. Beside which the moon will be under water in less than 12 years. 🚀🌝🌊
18
posted on
05/24/2019 2:02:24 PM PDT
by
rktman
( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
19
posted on
05/24/2019 2:02:43 PM PDT
by
Clutch Martin
(The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.)
To: Bernard
Kennedy’s inauguration address would have been January 24, 1961 so the first landing in July 1069
July 1069? hehheheh over 892 years earlier - those guys in the middle ages were just genius ... :)
It was a totally different NASA also ... by 1970 paper work motif had mostly superseded the get-it-done ethic
Now its all paperwork climate change and muslims - out of the handful of engineers the US produces annually, the few engineers interested in space go in robotics, while many of the mission directors jealously guard the information they discover. Then there are all the black projects ... Zuma comes to mind. The military will probably get there before NASA (even-though NASA is part of DOD).
20
posted on
05/24/2019 2:10:27 PM PDT
by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson