Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/10/2019 1:02:13 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

Not with Barr spying on him he won’t! Perjury Trap you know:-)


2 posted on 05/10/2019 1:05:58 PM PDT by Harpotoo (Being a socialist is a lot easier than having to WORK like the rest of US:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

What this means is that Mueller will resort to more leaking, publicity stunts, whispering campaigns, accusations etc to try to keep the thing alive

It wasn’t an “investigation”. It was set up and a coup by people who are not going to stop. They think they ARE the State, and no one they don’t like will get into the gang.


3 posted on 05/10/2019 1:06:14 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

I figured. He’d be asked by Republicans when did he know there was no collusion which would’ve been way before the 2018 elections.


4 posted on 05/10/2019 1:08:18 PM PDT by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

WONDER if they will rule Mueller in contempt and threaten him with jail and fines.


7 posted on 05/10/2019 1:16:36 PM PDT by Engedi (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

So, is Chairman Nadler going to put out a subpoena demanding the appearance of Mueller, and charge him with contempt for failure to comply?

Just asking.


8 posted on 05/10/2019 1:19:11 PM PDT by alloysteel (Dulce et decorum est Pro patria mori [Latin for"Sweet and fitting it is to die for one's country."])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote
If Mueller testifies, I would suggest that Barr have a couple of US Marshals in the hearing room, so the first time Mueller starts talking about redacted material, he can arrested for breaking the law.

Unfortunately, Congress has shielded itself from being prosecuted for breaking the law when "on official business" -- so you won't see Nadler or cronies being perp-walked out of the hearing room

9 posted on 05/10/2019 1:22:32 PM PDT by asinclair (Political hot air is a renewable energy resource)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Uh oh, they figured out they would not like what Mueller would say.

They talked and he said I can’t say what you want me to say because I will be under oath.


11 posted on 05/10/2019 1:29:01 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Before the vote, the White House announced it was asserting executive privilege over the document.

Before the vote~! This contempt charge is meaningless
until the Supreme court rules on the privilege.
Nader should be nailed to the wall over this.


12 posted on 05/10/2019 1:33:34 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote
Nadler's batting 'zero'! Now Muller won't be testfying.....neither is Trump Jr.


13 posted on 05/10/2019 1:38:35 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Dear President Trump:

I know that you know better than me, but I would really enjoy Herr Mueller testifying before the House Judiciary Committee.

I have only two questions for Special Council Mueller. I’m sure you know the two questions Mr. President.

So, please do not claim Executive privelage, and tell A.G. Barr to let him testify.

Hopefully a Republican will ask those two questions.

5.56mm


14 posted on 05/10/2019 1:41:52 PM PDT by M Kehoe (DRAIN THE SWAMP! BUILD THE WALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...

p


15 posted on 05/10/2019 1:43:28 PM PDT by bitt (The pain IS coming!!!'>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...

p


16 posted on 05/10/2019 1:43:28 PM PDT by bitt (The pain IS coming!!!'>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Nadler: Mueller Won’t Testify in Front of House Panel Next Week>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

BUT its a constitutional CWYSIS!

Muelley, you gots to come to the Donk partay!


18 posted on 05/10/2019 2:02:52 PM PDT by Candor7 ((Obama Fascism)http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

https://www.theepochtimes.com/as-rosenstein-leaves-doj-how-will-history-judge-him_2912510.html

excellent article


19 posted on 05/10/2019 2:03:16 PM PDT by bitt (The pain IS coming!!!'>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Can’t imagine Mueller would want to say anything right now. That the DOJ IG Report on FISA abuse is about to come out and it’s described as being “devastating” is not the way to walk into a wall.

The Rats will look to make him the scapegoat. They need one soon. Badly.


23 posted on 05/10/2019 2:38:39 PM PDT by romanesq (For George Soros so loved the world, he gave us Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

“Nadler, a Democrat from New York, told reporters the committee is still in talks with the Justice Department over Mueller’s appearance, but he expects Mueller to testify eventually.”

Nadler, a fat POS with mommy issues from the uninspiring state of Old Joke said nothing which was reported breathlessly by other morons from the … you guessed it … State of Old Joke.

Old Joke is a sht hole top to bottom.

You got to be a moron to live there.


25 posted on 05/10/2019 2:44:11 PM PDT by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Nadler should issue a contempt charge then. Mueller should then be arrested and put in that jail they have. Pelosi said it would get crowded in there, she just thought it would not be the real crooks she supports.


28 posted on 05/11/2019 1:16:41 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

I get the impression they don’t really want him to testify...there are many questions they don’t want him having to answer and it would make their full House contempt vote on Barr be exposed for the scam that it is. They will take the contempt vote first for numerous headlines / media excitement of another “Trump scandal” then have Mueller testify in the aftermath to drown it out and they and the media can spin the questions of Mueller as “desperation” because of the “scandal” involving the AG. The contempt vote probably also will be scheduled to overshadow the release of the IG report.

This delay presents an opportunity - perhaps the Senate Judiciary Committee could get him first. In addition, when the IG report is released, bring Barr into the Senate Judiciary Committee to testify after the contempt vote has taken place to discuss the IG report - the focus on Barr from the contempt vote could then backfire on the Dems as it would actually cause more exposure for the IG report.


30 posted on 05/12/2019 9:37:34 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson