1 posted on
05/04/2019 7:42:52 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
To: SunkenCiv
2 posted on
05/04/2019 7:43:12 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: BenLurkin
Was anything of value lost? JK. NYC being destroyed would be an economic tragedy.
3 posted on
05/04/2019 7:46:11 PM PDT by
cdcdawg
(If white, western culture makes you feel out of place, THAT IS BECAUSE IT IS NOT YOUR PLACE!)
To: BenLurkin
If only. Too bad it's only a simulation.
To: BenLurkin
Did these guys watch Sudden Impact last week?
5 posted on
05/04/2019 7:47:16 PM PDT by
Vermont Lt
(If we get Medicare for all, will we have to show IDs for service?)
To: BenLurkin
Women, children and minorities most impacted.
To: BenLurkin
Lookit. You use a Goauld shuttle to send the thing into hyperspace. Does Samantha Carter have to think of everything? Now, if we can figure out how to just destroy NYC....
9 posted on
05/04/2019 7:48:29 PM PDT by
Rastus
To: BenLurkin
"Washington considered sending a nuclear bomb to deflect the 60-meter rockrepeating a successful strategy that saved Tokyo last year
but it was crippled by political disagreements. "
Accurate simulation.
15 posted on
05/04/2019 8:00:53 PM PDT by
Kirkwood
(Zombie Hunter)
To: BenLurkin
Simulations don’t provide adequate training exercises. America deserves better!
16 posted on
05/04/2019 8:01:25 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason.)
To: BenLurkin
I may need a ride off this rock.

20 posted on
05/04/2019 8:41:33 PM PDT by
EasySt
(Say not this is the truth, but so it seems to me to be, as I see this thing I think I see #KAG)
To: BenLurkin
Simulated women and minorities hardest hit...
21 posted on
05/04/2019 8:59:55 PM PDT by
OrangeHoof
(Trump is Making the Media Grate Again)
To: BenLurkin
Nothing ruins property values more than an impending asteroid strike, except muslimes moving into the neighborhood. Tbats worse.
25 posted on
05/04/2019 9:25:24 PM PDT by
griffin
To: BenLurkin
This 'exercise' is nothing but scare mongering. It's so unrealistic that it's not even disguised. The land area of large cities around the world is tiny compared with all the rest of the millions of square miles of totally uninhabited area. The odds of an errant asteroid hitting, not one, but two of the largest cities in the US, is vanishing small. Just think of throwing random darts at a spinning globe of the earth. What are the odds of one of the darts hitting, not one, but two US large cities? Note that the known meteor 'explosions' over the last century, or so, hit mostly uninhabited areas.
The line that indecisiveness prevented a second deflection attempt is equally absurd. It was demonstrated that the first deflection strike actually worked. How could anyone prevent another, especially when the new target is New York City?
27 posted on
05/05/2019 4:10:21 AM PDT by
norwaypinesavage
(Calm down and enjoy the ride, great things are happening for our country)
To: BenLurkin
Gee, I was hoping it would be DC....
30 posted on
05/05/2019 4:36:25 AM PDT by
unread
(Joe McCarthy was right.......)
To: BenLurkin
So in about 8 years there’s a 1% chance that an asteroid will hit earth. OK, but how do they come up with the idea it will hit a major city in the US such as Denver or NYC?
Have they calculated the exact trajectory of the object relative to what part of the earth will be in that path at that exact minute? (keeping in mind the earth is both rotating around the sun and spinning at the same time)
IMO this is climate change grade science at work creating fear. The so called scientists live in their big city democrat bubble and only worry about a rat infested metropolis. If they knew for fact it would hit Rapid City, SD they could care less about those people and worry about the dust fallout drifting towards rat cities.
To: BenLurkin
If it was a simulation, then why couldn’t they tune a few parameters to assure 100% success? How do you program a simulation to predict failure?
I suppose they used Monte Carlo Simulation and ran a hundred thousand simulation runs with a fault tree and assigned probabilities.
The notion of us unintentionally breaking off a chunk of the asteroid which then hits the earth has been around a long time.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson