Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/04/2019 7:42:52 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

ping


2 posted on 05/04/2019 7:43:12 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Was anything of value lost? JK. NYC being destroyed would be an economic tragedy.


3 posted on 05/04/2019 7:46:11 PM PDT by cdcdawg (If white, western culture makes you feel out of place, THAT IS BECAUSE IT IS NOT YOUR PLACE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
If only. Too bad it's only a simulation.
 
4 posted on 05/04/2019 7:46:39 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Did these guys watch Sudden Impact last week?


5 posted on 05/04/2019 7:47:16 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (If we get Medicare for all, will we have to show IDs for service?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Women, children and minorities most impacted.


6 posted on 05/04/2019 7:47:19 PM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
Lookit. You use a Goa’uld shuttle to send the thing into hyperspace. Does Samantha Carter have to think of everything? Now, if we can figure out how to just destroy NYC....
9 posted on 05/04/2019 7:48:29 PM PDT by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
"Washington considered sending a nuclear bomb to deflect the 60-meter rock—repeating a successful strategy that saved Tokyo last year— but it was crippled by political disagreements. "

Accurate simulation.

15 posted on 05/04/2019 8:00:53 PM PDT by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Simulations don’t provide adequate training exercises. America deserves better!


16 posted on 05/04/2019 8:01:25 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
I may need a ride off this rock.


20 posted on 05/04/2019 8:41:33 PM PDT by EasySt (Say not this is the truth, but so it seems to me to be, as I see this thing I think I see #KAG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Simulated women and minorities hardest hit...


21 posted on 05/04/2019 8:59:55 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (Trump is Making the Media Grate Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Nothing ruins property values more than an impending asteroid strike, except muslimes moving into the neighborhood. Tbats worse.


25 posted on 05/04/2019 9:25:24 PM PDT by griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
This 'exercise' is nothing but scare mongering. It's so unrealistic that it's not even disguised. The land area of large cities around the world is tiny compared with all the rest of the millions of square miles of totally uninhabited area. The odds of an errant asteroid hitting, not one, but two of the largest cities in the US, is vanishing small. Just think of throwing random darts at a spinning globe of the earth. What are the odds of one of the darts hitting, not one, but two US large cities? Note that the known meteor 'explosions' over the last century, or so, hit mostly uninhabited areas.

The line that indecisiveness prevented a second deflection attempt is equally absurd. It was demonstrated that the first deflection strike actually worked. How could anyone prevent another, especially when the new target is New York City?

27 posted on 05/05/2019 4:10:21 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Calm down and enjoy the ride, great things are happening for our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Gee, I was hoping it would be DC....


30 posted on 05/05/2019 4:36:25 AM PDT by unread (Joe McCarthy was right.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

So in about 8 years there’s a 1% chance that an asteroid will hit earth. OK, but how do they come up with the idea it will hit a major city in the US such as Denver or NYC?

Have they calculated the exact trajectory of the object relative to what part of the earth will be in that path at that exact minute? (keeping in mind the earth is both rotating around the sun and spinning at the same time)

IMO this is climate change grade science at work creating fear. The so called scientists live in their big city democrat bubble and only worry about a rat infested metropolis. If they knew for fact it would hit Rapid City, SD they could care less about those people and worry about the dust fallout drifting towards rat cities.


32 posted on 05/05/2019 5:16:31 AM PDT by redfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

If it was a simulation, then why couldn’t they tune a few parameters to assure 100% success? How do you program a simulation to predict failure?

I suppose they used Monte Carlo Simulation and ran a hundred thousand simulation runs with a fault tree and assigned probabilities.

The notion of us unintentionally breaking off a chunk of the asteroid which then hits the earth has been around a long time.


35 posted on 05/05/2019 9:17:53 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson