Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Roberts Court Is Considering the Legal Reasoning of Jim Crow to Uphold a Rigged Census (barf)
Slate.com ^ | 4/25/2019 | ERIC L. MULLER

Posted on 04/26/2019 3:02:06 PM PDT by Beave Meister

There’s an odious Supreme Court case from 1971, Palmer v. Thompson, that most people don’t remember and that most who do remember wish they could forget. It’s a relic of a bygone era—one of the last pieces of the Jim Crow system that the Supreme Court ever sustained.

On our current Supreme Court, Palmer v. Thompson looks to be having a moment. Its reasoning stealthily drove last year’s decision in Trump v. Hawaii, in which the court’s five-justice conservative majority upheld the travel restrictions that the president had planned during the campaign to be a “Muslim ban.” And this week’s oral arguments in the census case suggest that four of the conservative justices who upheld that pretextual ban—and the fifth conservative who replaced Anthony Kennedy—are poised to use the reasoning of both Palmer and that travel ban decision to endorse the administration’s tactic of forcing people to reveal their citizenship status if they simply want to be counted as present in the country.

How could a late-stage Jim Crow decision be wreaking such havoc in the 21st century?

Palmer v. Thompson was about a particular racist notion that surfaced in white people in the American South at the idea of being in the water with black people. As late as 1963, the city of Jackson, Mississippi, ran five public pools, all of them for whites only. A lawsuit led a federal judge to declare that black people had the constitutional right to unsegregated use of the city’s pools. Jackson’s political leaders responded not by integrating the pools but by closing them.

(Excerpt) Read more at slate.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: 2020; blacks; census; conservatives; elections; hispanics; illegalaliens; jimcrow; johnroberts; liberals; muslims; scotus; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: Beave Meister

This article reads like it was written by a Liberal/Leftist who knows his side is going to lose at the Supreme Court and is preemptively writing his criticism of what he believes will be in the Opinion of the Court. Perhaps he should write an article about how upset he will be when President Trump is reelected in 2020.


21 posted on 04/26/2019 9:11:57 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

They act as if it’s a race thing instead of a citizenship thing...thereby telling us it is certain races who are the biggest offenders....


22 posted on 04/27/2019 4:07:15 AM PDT by trebb (Don't howl about illegal leeches while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson