[little jeremiah]

Thinking....

2118
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
7 Sep 2018 - 3:22:13 PM

>>2926085
If [RR] is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty.
if Mueller is dirty, [RR] must also be dirty.
Q

[Bigg Red]

*mark

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

CONGRESS requested a Special Counsel to investigate whether the Trump campaign worked hand-in-hand with the Russians to facilitate a specific outcome in the 2016 election.

DAG Rod Rosenstein expanded the scope of the SC to include actions by POTUS Trump that may rise to the crime of Obstruction of Justice.

The SC report found no evidence of hand-in-hand collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian agents during the 2016 election.

The SC report declined to make specific references to Obstruction of Justice because there was no crime to engender obstruction activity.

These conclusions were appropriately reported to CONGRESS (once again, CONGRESS commissioned the Special Counsel).

CONGRESS now invokes their oversight authority to determine if there is evidence to find collusion or obstruction, matter-of-factly stating that they know of and can provide that evidence.

If that evidence was withheld from the Special Counsel by members of CONGRESS to be exposed at a later date separate and away from the Special Counsel, is that not Obstruction of Justice? Is not the withholding of ANY exculpatory evidence obstruction of justice, ESPECIALLY if it is withheld from an investigation commissioned by CONGRESS?

Will Nadler hold Schiff in contempt of congress for Obstruction?

[Grimmy]

My take is dirty, rolled and controlled.