Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America gets its ‘a@@ handed to it’ in WW3 simulations
Daily mail ^ | 11MAR19 | By Megan Sheets For Dailymail.com

Posted on 03/23/2019 6:15:25 AM PDT by vannrox

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last
To: Leaning Right
Because of cutbacks, the "machine gun" is actually a painted broomstick

But they only work 35 hours per week, get 6 weeks of vacation and have a great socialized medicine program.

Oh, and I almost forgot they have the US military to protect them.

41 posted on 03/23/2019 6:55:16 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
War III breaks out. First five minutes we take out leaders of China and Putin with nuclear blasts . Game over.

See #39.

42 posted on 03/23/2019 6:57:40 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
3% additional spending tips the scales in our favor? I find it hard to believe that such a little bit at the margin could have such a decisive impact.

Obviously you did not read the report and the fine print carefully.

The proposed 3% additional funding includes an allocation of $20billion to the RAND corporation as a consultant to the DoD.

43 posted on 03/23/2019 6:57:46 AM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

Their failure happened in 1974 or so. Some IBM guy threw together something to get them going.

They never corrected it, just kept building on it.

Then the poor guy who had worked on it for 40 years, using the most non-standard practices I have ever seen, got quite ill with cancer (I’m sympathetic having lost a family member). He was so ill he screwed up the code that only he knew.

Guess what? Nobody could fix this thing, not even the gal who had been there over 20 years.

But they expected me to fix it in 2.5 months. I kept telling them I can’t just hack away, it’s going to screw up all the financials. The gal and I tried a few small things but it wasn’t fixing the problem.

So I had to walk away. They weren’t going to let me stay.

Yeah, fix a 40 year old problem in 2.5 months with little or no documentation, not even practical comments in the code.

And believe me, the situation was worse from there.

Sure. I’ll just win Powerball twice a week. That will be easier.

Never saw anything like it. A complete hack job and a total silo. Without any real backups nor development structure.

I was the 2nd person in a row to give up and walk away.

Still, they can’t figure out what their main problem was.


44 posted on 03/23/2019 7:02:25 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Chewbarkah
This study implies massive waste in US defense spending

There is massive waste in US defense spending. It's inside the expanded DC beltway spending. And that was done to buy everyone off so that Bush could get a consensus to invade Iraq. It's the deal that has brought down the US. For every fed or military employee in the Pentagon there is at least one and possibly three support service contractor coat holder and power point presentation specialist.

The consequence - a massive ripoff of the American taxpayer spent inside the DC metro area, and total utter incompetence at a level that rivals the worst corrupt third world dictatorship you have ever seen. The Republicans like it because of the money that goes to cronies. The Democrats like it because it is defense dollars that goes to jobs and not lethality.

I hope everyone gets it how those two GOPee clowns destroyed the United States.

45 posted on 03/23/2019 7:03:40 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ScottfromNJ
It seems the simulation assumes nukes won’t be used. Using nukes against key enemy military targets is likely a key part of our counter attack strategy and bolsters the capabilities of our conventional forces.

Any "hot" war with Russia and/or China will start out nuclear with the fist strike.

46 posted on 03/23/2019 7:04:14 AM PDT by Drew68 (No, as a matter of fact, I didn't read the article.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

[It will never recover to what it once waS]

dang it


47 posted on 03/23/2019 7:04:15 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson; SkyPilot; Roman_War_Criminal; null and void

I knew we were in deep trouble when I saw how much we were borrowing from China to finance the nation building.

I don’t remember the exact numbers but I was definitely taken aback.

This was a couple of years or so before the banks really went down in 2008 along with Lehman Brothers, etc.

And then along comes Barack who spends even more...

I’m just wondering when the next one is.


48 posted on 03/23/2019 7:06:53 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
"If the United States had to fight Russia in a Baltic contingency or China in a war over Taiwan, Americans could face a decisive military defeat,' the Commission said in a November report...Work also warned that US military bases across Europe and the Pacific are not equipped to handle the fire they would face in a high-end conflict.

The scenarios also seem to assume first strike by China or Russia

49 posted on 03/23/2019 7:07:14 AM PDT by tlozo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
.RAND’s studies were funded by the Pentagon. When would the Pentagon ever accept a result that did not urge increased defense spending? I don’t blame Pentagon generals for wanting ever more military strength. That is their job. But I expect some form of civilian DoD oversight as well.
50 posted on 03/23/2019 7:09:18 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard (Power is more often surrendered than seized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

Where is Russia getting the money to fight this imagined war? How about China? Are they cashing in their bonds?


51 posted on 03/23/2019 7:09:20 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham ("God is a spirit, and man His means of walking on the earth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

If the war was being waged against free Americans in America, then yes, I would agree.


52 posted on 03/23/2019 7:09:53 AM PDT by chris37 (No wall? No vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

The clip from Yes, Prime Minister is still relevant for the most part.


53 posted on 03/23/2019 7:12:37 AM PDT by wally_bert (Disc jockeys are as interchangeable as spark plugs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris; ProtectOurFreedom

"...work smarter, not harder, and think outside the box..."


The net net, at the end of the day, is that will require a paradigm shift where we all swim in our own lane.

54 posted on 03/23/2019 7:14:57 AM PDT by Blue Jays ( Rock hard ~ Ride free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
I think it was a general named Eisenhower, who knew a little bit about planning for combat.
55 posted on 03/23/2019 7:15:50 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard (Power is more often surrendered than seized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Blue Jays

Let’s make sure we’re all singing from the same page!!


56 posted on 03/23/2019 7:19:34 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
I wanted to say Eisenhower, didn't want to embarass myself and be wrong. I'm ashamed enough I don't have the exact quote right, especially with only my first cup of coffee right now.

FFS, I'm usually much better than this and would've at least attempted to google it!

57 posted on 03/23/2019 7:19:55 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: chris37
As CiC, I believe that Trump could potentially win a war.

No matter who is President, half the country will be rooting for the other side.

Any "hot" war with a major power will also bring with it civil conflicts at home as various factions use the pandemonium to settle scores.

It won't be like WWII with an entire nation united behind a just cause. It'll be street fighting between left and right elements fighting each other and amongst themselves.

We have no idea of the chaos.

58 posted on 03/23/2019 7:21:43 AM PDT by Drew68 (No, as a matter of fact, I didn't read the article.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tlozo
"If the United States had to fight Russia in a Baltic contingency or China in a war over Taiwan, Americans could face a decisive military defeat"...

One of the problems is that there is this little thing called geography. Some places are very easy for others to get to and very hard for the US to get to. "Spheres of influence" is not a political abstraction. It is a law of physics. Russia can project power a couple hundred miles a whole lot easier than we can project power a few thousand. The logistics costs alone prove the point. It's why offense requires a large multiple of defensive power in order to overcome defenses. The guy who is there has a huge advantage. It's why maneuver warfare works - deny the defender the advantage of being there by going somewhere else.

Think of it the other way around. Imagine the survivability of a Russian Task Force in the Gulf of Mexico with few narrow passages out and utterly surrounded by hostile forces. The Gulf is unquestionably indisputably ours.

59 posted on 03/23/2019 7:22:17 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: coloradan

Yes, rand does more than this. They also create anti gun, anti American and anti freedom policy.


60 posted on 03/23/2019 7:24:04 AM PDT by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson