Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Vanity) Question for Commercial Pilots
Free Republic ^ | 3/20/19 | central_va

Posted on 03/20/2019 6:17:38 AM PDT by central_va

I have about 200+ hours in single engine and some instrument time though I never got that ticket. VFR for ever.

Ok, let me ask you pro's: Even if the elevator trim is jammed nose down (FOR WHATEVER REASON!) in a commercial jet and cannot be neutralized ( FOR WHATEVER REASON) can human strength overcome that and pull the nose up anyway?

Can someone please answer that question?


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: airspeed; trim; yoke
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-120 next last
To: central_va
No offense, I'm not condescending to you at all, just pointing out that I answered your first post which was an aeronautical question with no references to computer flight control at all.

I cannot speak as to how to out wit a flight computer, but I suspect your concerns about pilot training are valid.

61 posted on 03/20/2019 7:40:20 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (America NEEDS Mob Rule, another European and Mid East World War and a universal Draft)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

None taken. Sucks to be a commercial pilot. I’d trust humans over computers even though the pilot may have to work for living....


62 posted on 03/20/2019 7:43:06 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Delta 21

I think you meant MS flight simulator.


63 posted on 03/20/2019 7:44:11 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Everything I said run by automated control systems. Think about your home thermostat...do you want to sit there and turn your furnace on manually for 10 minutes every hour? Are you so “lazy”you won’t do that?

No modern technology would be possible without automated control. Every factory, power plant, refinery, elevator, climate control, power distribution, pipeline, building elevator, truck, train, car, cement kiln, steel mill, chemical plant, lumber mill, ship, satellite, fiber optic system, and mine you use directly or indirectly today has automated control. You will probably use a million control systems directly and indirectly today.

None of those would be possible without automated control systems, “Lazy” has absolutely nothing to do with it.


64 posted on 03/20/2019 7:44:41 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

I responded to central_va’s first post that did not specify the category of the problem.


65 posted on 03/20/2019 7:44:45 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (America NEEDS Mob Rule, another European and Mid East World War and a universal Draft)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Yes the aircraft were grounded and the jackscrews were replaced/repaired.

261 had made a common in flight trim adjustment when their jack screw mechanically stripped the threads probably from improper lubrication.

66 posted on 03/20/2019 7:51:33 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (America NEEDS Mob Rule, another European and Mid East World War and a universal Draft)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
Everything I said run by automated control systems. Think about your home thermostat...do you want to sit there and turn your furnace on manually for 10 minutes every hour? Are you so “lazy”you won’t do that?

If I was being paid $100K/yr I'd do it. It is not the same thing. My furnace is not cruising at 30K feet with 200 people hanging on it.

Altitude hold and wing stabilization is not the same as the computer taking over the operation of the ENTIRE AIRCRAFT. Is it asking to much for the pilot to fly the plane for 10 minutes during climb out and 20 minutes during the approach? Is that asking too much?

67 posted on 03/20/2019 7:51:48 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Well the AOA (angle of attack) feeds a computer that tells the elevator what to do. You have to override the computer. I guess Boeing didn’t get the message through on how to override it. I’ll bet the pilots were pulling back on the yoke like crazy as the plane was going down but the computer was overriding their input. IMHO.


68 posted on 03/20/2019 7:55:18 AM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
pulling back on the yoke like crazy as the plane was going down but the computer was overriding their input. IMHO.

Yes, that is the bottom line.

69 posted on 03/20/2019 7:56:54 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: central_va

You would figure that they (Boeing) would have placarded the emergency override procedure and had it attached to the yoke.


70 posted on 03/20/2019 8:02:40 AM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Not a pilot but I do know quite a lot about aircraft. As such, I would think the answer to your question would depend on the control system being used. Fly-by-wire? Or actual, physical cable control? Cables? Then it would depend on what has the trim jammed.


71 posted on 03/20/2019 8:03:24 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Academia is where totally useless, parasitic ideologues and idiots go to hide from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhoisAlanGreenspan?
That first video wasn't the best one, this is.

It shows in 737max simulator the trim controls and override switches.

72 posted on 03/20/2019 8:10:33 AM PDT by WhoisAlanGreenspan?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: central_va

I guess you could do like Denzel Washington, and roll the airplane inverted.

/s


73 posted on 03/20/2019 8:10:41 AM PDT by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches, and get with what's real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

The balance tab is like an aerodynamic “power assist”. It’s not a trim tab.


74 posted on 03/20/2019 8:13:49 AM PDT by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches, and get with what's real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: central_va
You've got the wrong idea about fly-by-wire and computers on aircraft. Take the F/A -18 for example (don't quote me but I'm going to be close ). There's two primary flight control computers, either of which can do the job. There's several levels of backup computers that can also take over if needed, some of these computers are normally employed with avionics or weapon system jobs. So there's something like 6 or so computers that can fly it and one final one that theoretically could fly it, but they never tested it and you're welcome to bail out without even trying it.

And this is an airplane developed in the mid 1970's.

75 posted on 03/20/2019 8:27:50 AM PDT by WhoisAlanGreenspan?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: WhoisAlanGreenspan?

Tell that to all those dead passengers.


76 posted on 03/20/2019 8:30:44 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: WhoisAlanGreenspan?

There is no excuse or justification for an in flight computer to override the pilot’s manual inputs. Don’t even try.


77 posted on 03/20/2019 8:32:39 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: PhiloBedo

So where is the trim tab? Is there one?


78 posted on 03/20/2019 8:33:12 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Oh I completely agree with you there.

As someone who has designed, built and maintained automated systems where multiple conditions need to be considered and tested it's mind blowing that this MCAS doesn't factor in the pilot or proximity to ground.

From an earlier thread; “Since it operates in situations where the aircraft is under relatively high g load and near stall, a pilot should never see the operation of MCAS. As such, Boeing did not include an MCAS description in its FCOM.” (flight control operations manual) The explainer continues: “In this case, MCAS will trim nose as designed to assist the pilot during recover, likely going unnoticed by the pilot.”

according to a Tuesday report in The Wall Street Journal: “One high-ranking Boeing official said the company had decided against disclosing more details to cockpit crews due to concerns about inundating average pilots with too much information — and significantly more technical data — than they needed or could digest."

79 posted on 03/20/2019 9:04:14 AM PDT by WhoisAlanGreenspan?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: WhoisAlanGreenspan?

It seems the average VFR pilot is more proficient in actually flying than the pros. Heck the plane I flew didn’t have anything automated. I did it all. It did have GPS and elevator trim. That’s about it.


80 posted on 03/20/2019 9:10:18 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-120 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson