Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TomServo; Bull Snipe

That would mean Halleck, not Grant of course.

Sounds about right, that is how Lincoln used Halleck.


20 posted on 03/09/2019 4:54:47 PM PST by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK

Yeah - saw your reply about Halleck and replied back - sorry for the confusion :-)


21 posted on 03/09/2019 5:23:44 PM PST by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: BroJoeK

Thanks.


24 posted on 03/10/2019 8:04:21 AM PDT by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: BroJoeK

“I’d say Lincoln’s view of Halleck represents Lincoln’s genius in finding an effective role for a less than sterling senior general.
Indeed, thinking more kindly of Halleck: if you consider the famous adage: “amateurs talk tactics, professionals talk logistics”what Lincoln called a “clerk” may well have been a master-logistician quietly working to use the Union’s best advantages to keep fighting generals like Grant well supplied.”
Spot on. While none would say Halleck was a good field commander, his handling of the army bureaucracy was outstanding. By late 1864 Halleck was managing the feeding, clothing, equipping, arming, medical care etc. for an Army of 800,000 men.
At that time, the Union Army was probably the best equipped army anywhere in the world.


25 posted on 03/10/2019 10:09:47 AM PDT by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson