[Jmouse007]

Rotten Tomatoes is blatantly schilling for the film and jerry-rigging their polls.

Rotten Tomatoes has literally destroyed the trust of their readers by deleting/expunging over FIFTY THOUSAND NEGATIVE audience VIEWER REVIEWS! Presto ...they just magically "dissapeared".

[x]

Rotten Tomatoes has literally destroyed the trust of their readers by deleting/expunging over FIFTY THOUSAND NEGATIVE audience VIEWER REVIEWS! Presto ...they just magically "dissapeared".

Were those reviews by people who actually saw the movie or comments by people who haven't seen the movie and decided to "review" it anyway? In situations like this it's hard to tell. Interesting article here.

[BillyBoy]

>> Rotten Tomatoes has literally destroyed the trust of their readers by deleting/expunging over FIFTY THOUSAND NEGATIVE audience VIEWER REVIEWS! Presto ...they just magically "dissapeared". <<

I would say its the opposite. Negative reviewers literally destroyed the trust of Rotten Tomatoes readers by writing negative "reviews" of a film that wasn't released yet and which they had never seen. I thought Batman vs. Superman would be crap, but after deciding not to see it, I didn't spam internet webpages with bogus "reviews" pretending to be a first hand account of the film's content. To do otherwise would be trolling, wouldn't you say?