Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton blames gutting of Voting Rights Act for her 2016 loss
AOL ^ | 3/4/2019 | Hunter Walker

Posted on 03/04/2019 7:29:50 AM PST by simpson96

SELMA, Ala. — Speaking Sunday at the historic Brown Chapel A.M.E. Church, former Secretary of State, First Lady, and 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton suggested a key Supreme Court decision may have cost her the White House.(snip)

“I was the first person who ran for president without the protection of the Voting Rights Act and I will tell you, it makes a really big difference,” Clinton said.

Clinton prefaced her comments by discussing the history of the Voting Rights Act, which was passed in 1965. The law required federal oversight of voting in nine southern states and an array of other jurisdictions that were found to have engaged in discriminatory practices. Clinton noted the law was reauthorized by Congress in 2006 while she was in the Senate.

“It was based on thousands and thousands of pages of testimony as to why we ... needed the Voting Rights Act. I thought it was a done deal, passed out of the Congress, signed by a Republican president, and then it found its way to the Supreme Court,” Clinton recounted.

Clinton said Republicans who wanted to “pull back rights” were behind the legal challenge that brought the 2013 Supreme Court decision, in which conservative justices struck down the core of the law.

“They found a receptive Supreme Court who came up with the most absurd decision,” said Clinton, adding, “They gutted the Voting Rights Act.”(snip)

“It doesn’t just make a difference in Alabama and Georgia. It made a difference in Wisconsin where the best studies that have been done said somewhere between 40,000 and 80,00” thousand people were turned away from the polls because of the color of their skin, because of their age, because of whatever excuse could be made up to stop a fellow American citizen from voting,” Clinton said.

(Excerpt) Read more at aol.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last
To: yoe

Jeb Bush was a dynamo compared to her.


21 posted on 03/04/2019 7:39:24 AM PST by Leep (It's.. (W)all or nothing..!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: simpson96; All

Thanks for posting. OUTSTANDING comments BUMP!


22 posted on 03/04/2019 7:40:04 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Democrat will control everything starting in 2020 unless we get a handle on their latest frauds and massive threats to the Republic -
(A) ballot harvesting, (b) absentee voting, (C) motor voting, and, (early voting).

Democrats have pushed voter fraud to startling heights. “Legalized Ballot Harvesting”
added Over 250,000 Votes in Orange County – Flipping Four Seats Blue.

POINTS TO PONDER Our system anticipates politicians' craven desire to consolidate power, and intentionally prevents it.
The Left does not like limits to its power, but those limits exist. And there's NOTHING they can do about it!

========================================

Trump has to get rid of the leftover Obamatons who are still manipulating the immigration agencies....
placing border jumpers in electoral college states.....registering them to vote Democrat before they violate our borders.

But consider vote harvesting schemes have affected (and can affect) only ONE
body of the Federal government: the House of Representatives........

- No matter how much vote harvesting they do, it will not affect the Senate (there are already two democrats from California).

-No matter how much vote harvesting they do, it will not affect the Presidency (California's number of electors is fixed until the next census, and the number of VOTES does not affect electoral allocation).

-No matter how much vote harvesting they do, it will not affect the Courts (California has a say in the population of the courts only through its senators, which are already chosen, and both are already democrats).

- California will likely LOSE representatives after the 2020 census, with illegal immigration being thwarted and a citizenship question likely being on the 2020 census (currently being litigated in court). (hat tip cotton 1776)

23 posted on 03/04/2019 7:40:08 AM PST by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

24 posted on 03/04/2019 7:40:20 AM PST by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

*** LOCK HER UP!!! ***


25 posted on 03/04/2019 7:41:28 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: akalinin
Only then will the current soft coup end.

Soft Coup???

Soft coup? This one has everything but the knives on the ides of every month.

26 posted on 03/04/2019 7:42:44 AM PST by Don Corleone (Nothing makes the delusional more furious than truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

I know this is redundant but the woman has no shame. She would climb a tree to tell a lie, rather than stay on the ground and tell the truth. And the truth is, no one likes Hillary but Hillary ... and Chelsea, daughter of Webb.


27 posted on 03/04/2019 7:43:32 AM PST by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Hillary lost because she’s a rear hole.


28 posted on 03/04/2019 7:44:23 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

She is STILL blaming everyone and everything but herself for her defeat. Hillary, you were, and remain, a horrible candidate.


29 posted on 03/04/2019 7:44:27 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Well. let’s see:

Here are some of the reasons Hillary says she lost:

Herself: In her book, Hillary blames her “damn emails,” her remarks about putting coal miners out of business, and calling Trump’s supporters “deplorable.”

Russia: “What Putin wanted to do was...influence our election, and he’s not exactly fond of strong women, so you add that together and that’s pretty much what it means.”

The DNC: “I’m now the nominee of the Democratic Party. I inherit nothing from the Democratic Party. It was bankrupt...I had to inject money into it - the DNC - to keep it going.”

Sexism and misogyny: “Sexism and misogyny played a role in the 2016 presidential election. Exhibit A is that the flagrantly sexist candidate won.”

A Democratic predecessor: “It’s really difficult to succeed a president of your own party who has served two terms. That is a historical fact.”

Bernie Sanders: “His attacks caused lasting damage, making it harder to unify progressives in the general election and paving the way for Trump’s ‘Crooked Hillary’ campaign.”

Wikileaks: “The comey letter, aided to great measure by the Russian WikiLeaks, raised...doubts again. And so even though I won the popular vote, enough people in a few states...were just raising all these questions.”

Her “traditional” campaign: “I was running a traditional presidential campaign...while Trump was running a reality TV show that expertly and relentlessly stoked Americans’ anger and resentment.”

The debate questions, not being asked “how the candidates planned to create jobs”: “I was waiting for the moment when one of the people asking the questions would have said, ‘Well, so, exactly how are you going to create more jobs?’”

Political journalists: “[Journalists] can’t bear to face their own role in helping elect Trump, from providing him free airtime to giving my emails three times more coverage than all the issues affecting people’s lives combined.”

Campaign financing: “You had Citizens United come to its full fruition. So unaccountable money flowing in against me, against other Democrats, in a way that we hadn’t seen and then attached to this weaponized information war.”

President Obama: “I do wonder sometimes about what would have happened if President Obama had made a televised address to the nation...warning that our democracy was under attack. Maybe more Americans would have woken up to the threat in time.”

TV coverage of the campaign: “When you have a presidential campaign and the total number of minutes on TV news...was 32 minutes, I don’t blame voters. Voters are going to hear what they hear...and if they don’t get a broad base of information to make judgements on.”

Low-information voters: “You put yourself in the position of a low-information voter, and all of a sudden your Facebook feed, your Twitter account is saying, ‘Oh my gosh, Hillary Clinton is running a child trafficking operation in Washington with John Podesta.’”

Women under pressure from men: “They will be under tremendous pressure from fathers and husbands and boyfriends and male employers not to vote for ‘the girl.’”

James Comey: “The determining factor was the intervention by Comey on October 28...but for that intervention, I would have won.”

Might as well blame something else. She has been a wonderful silent for quite a while while they balance her herdeutetrabenazine and/or valbenazine.

But, let’s remember, Drugs cannot cure mental illnesses. Rather, they work to control many of the most troubling symptoms, often enabling people with mental disorders to return to normal or near-normal functioning. Reducing symptoms with medication can also enhance the effectiveness of other treatments, such as psychotherapy (a type of counseling). And she’s got those folks on speed dial.

rwood


30 posted on 03/04/2019 7:44:54 AM PST by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

If anyone needed a stainless steel toilet and concrete bed.


31 posted on 03/04/2019 7:45:14 AM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

“It was based on thousands and thousands of pages of testimony as to why we ... needed the Voting Rights Act. I thought it was a done deal, passed out of the Congress, signed by a Republican president, and then it found its way to the Supreme Court,” Clinton recounted.


Cases don’t just “find their way to the Supreme Court”.

The legal case involved was filed by officials in Alabama, who sought release from the requirements of the voting rights act, because they were no longer discriminating against anyone in voting. In fact, as I recall, in that area, voter registration and turnout was higher among blacks than among whites. The discrimination of the past was long gone.

But facts don’t matter to the liberals. Hillary and her ilk will always think it’s 1960 in the south, and that blacks need their “protection”.

I would love to know about the 80,000 voters allegedly turned away from voting in Wisconsin. Does Hillary just make stuff up when giving a speech?


32 posted on 03/04/2019 7:45:36 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Dumb As A Stump


33 posted on 03/04/2019 7:45:52 AM PST by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Dearest hitlery: What a whining loser. STFU. You belong in prison for your many (and continuing) crimes. I spit on your worthless and malignant existence.


34 posted on 03/04/2019 7:46:03 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96
“I was the first person who ran for president without the protection of the Voting Rights Act..."

If she can claim this, which I don't consider much of a claim, can't Trump do the same? Not that he would, being sane.

Also, how does a white person claim "protection" from the VRA, which was meant for blacks?

35 posted on 03/04/2019 7:46:15 AM PST by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96
She really ought to get off that sulphur and brimstone bong:


36 posted on 03/04/2019 7:47:13 AM PST by Slyfox (Not my circus, not my monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Just more of the usual and customary Clinton Bullshit, Lies, and distortions. Truth being...she lost because she’s an asshole. Period.


37 posted on 03/04/2019 7:47:25 AM PST by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96
“I was the first person who ran for president without the protection of the Voting Rights Act and I will tell you, it makes a really big difference,” Clinton said.

Only problem is, the numbers say exactly the opposite: of the 9 states, plus many NC counties, covered by the Voting Rights Act, all have been red since at least 2000*, with no general redward trend in 2016 - in fact, several of them were more narrowly red in 2016 than in previous elections.

* Except VA, which has been blue since 2008, including Shrillary's win.

(source: https://www.270towin.com/states/)

38 posted on 03/04/2019 7:48:48 AM PST by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leep

“Is she sticking with this excuse?””

Well...for this week anyhow. Seems to be the race baiting flavor that works today.


39 posted on 03/04/2019 7:49:29 AM PST by redshawk (0pansy is a Liar and Hates.........he just hates!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Reason # 999,000 of why she lost the election!!! I will NEVER forget this bitch having the audacity to ask Trump during a debate if HE would be able to accept the election results when he lost!!! LOL, LOL, LOL, have you ever seen ANYONE not accept election results like this BITCH???? I guess she forgot she asked him this question, she is making a TOTAL FOOL of herself!!!


40 posted on 03/04/2019 7:49:30 AM PST by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson