Q Anon: 03/01/19 Trust Trump's Plan

qmap.pub ^

[mairdie]

	“Trust The Plan”
YouTube	Where We Go 1 We Go All	Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration. - 6 min
YouTube	President Trump	This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected (The Plan) - 6 min
Table	tang-soo et. al.	Q Boot Camp Quickest way to learn the basics about Q.
YouTube	Storm Is Upon Us	Q - We Are The Plan - 6 min
YouTube	Dan Duval	Discovering the Truth With Dan Duval-Part 3 -Excellent orientation to Q by Praying Medic
YouTube	Joe Masepoes	Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction Also, Stormisuponus on Bitchute
Threadreader	Jason Wright	Q Anon Is Real - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary
Twitter	Paul Serran	What is Q? - 31 point introduction
Medium	Martin Geddes	WWG1WGA: The greatest communications event in history - 4 min - quick overview
	“Pay Attention”
Thread	Qmap.pub	Q drops - created by Q, searchable by date or drop number, many additional features
Thread	Qanon.app	Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
Website	We-go-all.net	Q drops and research - includes extensive resources and links
Website	Qntmpkts.keybase.pub	Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
	“The Truth Is Spreading”
Thread	Anonymous	QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump
Thread	Qmap.pub	QProofs/Memes - compiled “proofs” and memes
The Oracle	Bagster	The Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread
Lexicon	Swordmaker	LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference
Website	Whitehouse	Whitehouse.gov - President Trump's Executive Orders, Proclamations, Nominations, WH press briefings and news
Website	FBI	vault.fbi.gov - new FOIA Library, containing 6,700 documents and other media
Website	State Dept.	foia.state.gov - Virtual Reading Room Documents Search
Table	FReeQs	Q Threads - Our prior Q threads on Free Republic
	“Power to the People”
Twitter	Sara Carter	Fox News National Security/War Correspondent sometimes cited by Q
Twitter	John Solomon	Award winning investigative journalist sometimes cited by Q
Twitter	Praying Medic	Q-drop reactions. Also, YouTube, Vimeo, Podbean.com and ITunes
YouTube	Dustin Nemos	Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent. Also, @NemoV on GAB.AI
Website	Saul Montes-Bradley	Non Q Commentary also hosting Rex, Brian Cates and Thomas Wictor
YouTube	X22 Report	Investigative Q-drop reactions
YouTube	In Pursuit of Truth	Brisk, lively drop analysis. Also on Gab.Ai
Twitter	Lisa Mei Crowley	Includes Q-drop reactions. Also, @lisamei62 on GAB.AI
	“Silent Majority No More”
Website	White House	Email the White House with your support and suggestions
Website	Congress	Email Congress with your support and suggestions
Thread	Little Jeremiah	Memes
Thread	Jim Robinson	Board Owner's Rules for Posts on Free Republic
	“Fight, Fight, Fight! ”
YouTube	President Reagan	A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images

[truthluva]

New Q Post

2943
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
3 Mar 2019 - 5:17:55 PM
https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/1102265163107971077 #128193;
More statements made (evidence) without presenting facts.
If ‘evidence’ exists(ed), under ‘broad’ scope #1, would Mueller have the auth to pursue?
https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download #128193;
The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confinned by then-FBI Director James 8. Corney in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on March 20, 2017, including:
(i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and
(ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and
(iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a).
Because no evidence exists(ed) and/or was found by SC/Mueller, was scope #2 enacted in an attempt to go outside of the ‘intended engagement’?
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4429989-Rod-Rosenstein-memo-outlining-scope-of-Mueller.html #128193;
Why is scope #2 classified only to AG/DAG and a select few others (read at terminal only)?
If ‘evidence’ exists(ed), why did R+D members of the Senate conclude NO DIRECT EVIDENCE EXISTS …………..?
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/senate-has-uncovered-no-direct-evidence-conspiracy-between-trump-campaign-n970536 #128193;
If ‘evidence’ exists(ed), as per your statement released today, again, why did the SENATE (R’s + D’s) JUST CONCLUDE NO EVIDENCE EXISTS?
When will Americans wake up to the [D] party con that is continually pushed without facts, without support, and supported and further pushed by the media arm of the [D] party [FAKE NEWS MEDIA]?
Reading the comments on these Tweets further demonstrates the seriousness of media brainwashing in our Country whereby statements are considered fact w/o the need to provide proof.
Group-Think.
Control of the Narrative.
If enough people state the same thing w/o providing evidence and/or support does it become FACTUAL to those caught in the loop?
NATIONAL CRISIS.
Q

[little jeremiah]

I have no idea why the images piled up like that...

[RitaOK]

That is hopeful, but will never sell to my Trump normies, whose revulsion of Sessions would have to be rehabilitated by the POTUS, himself, and was the biggest radical objection to Q cred, which really kills me.

It circles back to Trump is demonstrably 5:5 on NOT rehabilitating Jeff, but shaking his head, still. That will have to change, and may indicate that any tribunals are quite a way off, if they include Jeff Sessions.

OTOH, I’m not asked about Tribunals, so normies may not be as aware of their slowly increasing mention, by Graham and now a few others.

Thanks, laurel.

[little jeremiah]

What makes you think that Trump really didn’t know about Sessions’ recusal beforehand?

[truthluva]

Outstanding job!!

[AZLiberty]

I keep getting hypnotized by Maria Bartiromo

If so, you weren't as badly affected as everyone else who commented on the great background of Trump's speech. You're the first one who was still able to spell her name right.

[BiggBob]

New: Title TBD 2944 Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 3 Mar 2019 - 6:29:07 PM Anonymous 3 Mar 2019 - 6:28:42 PM >>5488382 CONFIRM TYPO? confinned → confirmed >>5488642 Confirmed. Q

[christianbasque]

What is your favorite hat color? /slide**********************slide back...has to be white in this case CJ.

[Balding_Eagle]

Trump was elected in spite of the Herculean efforts of Levin.

Day after day.

[christianbasque]

would have been better if there had been no coup attempt at all...*****************************Of course no coup better...as to why so re hats: They would be huge assets for our side against the DS...it would be a huge blow to the DS.

[Aquamarine]

Good job on the latest edition of The Oracle. Could you add me to The Oracle ping list?

[RitaOK]

I thought it was the work of the Offices of the Inspector General at JD and FBI who took the goods to Acting AG, RR, for generating recommendations for the Removal of all those bad actors.

RR meanwhile drew up cause for Trump to fire Comey, but hired Mueller.

Then the OIG fingered the bad guys at FBI and JD and they fell by the hand of RR, as Acting Attorney General.

Sessions was recused from the FISA activity and subsequent investigation, and deciding on bad actors, so OIG went to RR, because it all was related to the Russia dossier and Campaign targets and Sessions was out entirely of anything that had an R attached to it, for R ussia.

[Hostage]

A timeline shows Q saying “Trust Sessions” when the President was saying the same, and when the President turned against Sessions, Q stopped saying “Trust Sessions”.

The way to see this is to search the Q posts and mark each date when Q posted “Trust Sessions”. Fr each of those dates, check to see what P0TUS was saying. You will find a direct correlation.

When Q was posting “Trust Sessions”, Q was repeating what P0TUS was saying. And if you follow what the President was saying about Sessions over time, you will see he was shaken but willing to give Sessions the benefit of the doubt. But over time it became clear that P0TUS was fed up with Sessions especially for Sessions failure to prosecute Hillary. Chaffetz confirmed in a meeting with Sessions that Sessions wanted no part of going after the Clintons.

A similar play acts out in the firing of General Mattis. Listening to yesterday’s CPAC speech reveals the same dynamic in play. P0TUS wanted to describe the SWAMP and how all those that appear trustworthy are anything but.

[christianbasque]

Might be wrong but thought J Cleese had spoken against the muslim invasion in Brit.

[xone]

I forgot to add:

https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/dd524704-0a10-4a43-ba82-a487047b6a03

[John4.11]

whew.... good Oracle! ThankQ

[BiggBob]

2945

https://twitter.com/tedlieu
You should update your T-banner pic to properly reflect the crowd size when the event actually started.
Have you ever witnessed a public all-out attack by the opposition party against the President of the United States?
Those who would normally hide in the shadows are forced into the LIGHT.
P-A-N-I-C
Patriots in Control.
Q

[truthluva]

New Q Post 2945

[RitaOK]

Trump said he was not apprised of Sessions recusal at any point. Even the time when Sessions announced it. It was made public and POTUS had to react. Trump was so mad that it eventually brought Sessions offer to resign, is the way I remember it.

That was when Trump started complaining about the lost opportunity to nominate someone else, “if Sessions knew he was going to recuse”. I took that to mean POTUS thought Sessions must have weighed the possibility of recusing before he ever took his seat. I believe he recused two days later from all things Russia. Or, very soon after seated at JD. No?

[smileyface]

the 17th seems like a good date.