They’d be more than happy to keep a clean house, do the shopping, and have my slippers and cocktail ready for my daily 5 pm return.
They despise the feminists who have “ruined” things for them.
Posted on 02/26/2019 9:24:34 AM PST by Paal Gulli
(Frantically rebuilding the mound.)
They’d be more than happy to keep a clean house, do the shopping, and have my slippers and cocktail ready for my daily 5 pm return.
They despise the feminists who have “ruined” things for them.
Anyone who raises their eyebrows and attempts ANY form of "Because current year!" should be summarily dismissed with mockery.
Enjoy your cats.
Be attractive.
Don't be unattractive.
If men had to have babies, either they would find a better way to do it in10 years, or the human race would die out in one generation.
Eve's fault. And just think: that was before the fall, so Eve was literally in Paradise, her husband (by definition) had no flaws, and she threw it all away because some smooth-tongued reptile promised "More."
Just like Feminism.
That's why so many *men* went out and bought "Eat, Pray, Love" and "50 Shades"...
“Before I read I would say it’s a wasted effort if it doesn’t state in th thesis that is three generations of birth control and its resultant - abortion
You’re an idiot. Go ahead and read it. ”
Ok. Your prick like name calling aside.
lo and behold, here it is:
“Feminists are hypocrites root and branch. The kind of tough, sober-minded, serious woman who is the equal in mind and soul with a man is a conservative, and probably carries a gun to protect herself. She marries young, and comes a virgin to the marriage bed, and does not cohabitate with her “boyfriend” before marriage.
This is because such women — let us call them “ladies” as befits their noble character — are not fools, not self indulgence, and do not act on impulse. For a lady, the erotic impulse does not justify fornication, and fornication does not justify the need to kill the unborn to suit one’s own convenience, and likewise the need to kill the inconvenient life within, does not, for sober and noble ladies, justify turning to the government and asking Big Brother to rob taxpayers to pay for the red crime.”
I don’t have any pets. And why? Because my husband has had a trach since 2012 and is a ventilator at night. His pulmonologist recommends that owning a pet would endanger his health.
My condolences; I am given to understand that many things taken for granted (shaving, showering) are much more problematic.
Yep. I was married in 1989 and my husband has nearly died four or five times now. In a wheelchair at 1995 and on oxygen 24/7 and unable to work since then. Two bouts of pneumonia and a trach.
You never know what live is going to throw at you. Women need to learn how to be self reliant.
No longer can women just marry a knight on a white steed and expect to be taken care of the rest of their lives.
Besides, what kind of relationship between a man and a woman would that be anyway?
Modern women go for the wrong *kind* of strength, in general not in accord with their nature.
Man’s strength is offensive, in *accomplishing* external tasks and competing; woman’s strength is in endurance (like a caryatid), and developing consensus to strengthen the group and avoid conflict.
Oh — way too personal, but hats off to you for taking “in sickness and in health” seriously despite the cost to you: too many “modern, empowered women” would have cast hubby aside as soon as he was an inconvenience.
Marriage vows do not optimize happiness, they create a stable society, which is the best place for happiness to flourish without just taking from others.
You can understand why I feel disdain for the priests in the CC who sexually molest children.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.