Q Anon: 02/24/19 Trust Trump's Plan

qmap.pub ^ | 02/24/19 | FReepers, vanity

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

Phil...you made a major breach of de-trolling protocol.
Never have the trolls handle in the TO: line.
That way they don’t get paid for it.

[bitt]

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/feb/25/supreme-court-dead-judges-cant-issue-rulings/

Supreme Court: Dead judges can’t issue rulings

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

Damn!
Givin’ away de-trolling strateegery.

[bagster]

The ‘c’ is one down and to the right.

That can't be right. There were WAY more than six of those there.

Dude, it was the Oscars.

[outofsalt]

"Because Judge Reinhardt was no longer a judge at the time when the en banc decision in this case was filed, the Ninth Circuit erred in counting him as a member of the majority. That practice effectively allowed a deceased judge to exercise the judicial power of the United States after his death. But federal judges are appointed for life, not for eternity."

RBG is sad.

The grants of certiori are limited. (most of the list were denied)

[Defiant]

That is an interesting tidbit.

[MNDude]

The timing of this ruling seems to be too much of a coincidence.

[bitt]

Thanks! Actually I peeked but one suggestion was so ~~~ I didn’t post it... eeew..

[KitJ]

Why “Dubai”?

Vacation destination for the global hoi polloi where money can get you anything.

And there’s LOTS of money there.

Kind of like the “Rich Kids” channels on social media.

q.v. human trafficking, drug smuggling, sex crimes, etc. etc. etc.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

“statistically speaking”
After party?
Before party?
Party party?
Rape rape?

[philman_36]

Ah...yep. The intention was there. I meant for it to go to BiggBob's reply and blew it.

Long night, as you know.

[BiggBob]

Trump departs Andrews for Hanoi summit

https://youtu.be/t4uu68LlUl8

[bagster]

After party?
Before party?
Party party?
Rape rape?

Pants Party?

[bitt]

https://www.philly.com/news/nation-world/supreme-court-ruling-judge-decision-after-death-20190225.html

High court: court can’t count vote of deceased judge

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://fortune.com/2019/02/25/dead-judge-supreme-court-ruling/

‘Appointed for Life, Not for Eternity.’ Dead Judge’s Vote Shouldn’t Have Counted, Supreme Court Rules

[KitJ]

I did a short dive into the history of the poster. It's mucky in there. Very, very negative and condescending on almost every comment.OkD has some very serious problems with bitterness and insecurity. Maybe someone will throw a prayer his way?

Here's one. I'm done digging in that septic tank.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

:: Pants party? ::

My pants are tight!

[Califreak]

Fish slappers!

[bitt]

re: USSC decision - (I have no idea what’s going on..)

could this be an attempt to void any en banc decision that was filed after Judge Scalia’s death?

(I have no legal knowledge..but I look for derpishness in everything now...)

[Chuckster]

That episode with #2 would have ended a lot sooner if folks here could resist chumming the water and encouraging him.

[Defiant]

Love this line from the opinion:

“federal judges are appointed for life, not for eternity.”.

It is also interesting that they issue this at the current time, while Ginsberg’s status is in doubt. The opinion was “by the court” which means no one puts their name to it, the whole court issues it. Sotomayor concurred, no one else had a separate concurrence or dissent, meaning it was unanimous.

I didn’t see an indication in the opinion what they are doing with all the opinions that involved Reinhardt. This opinion only involved one case.