Am I reading this right? If PDJT signs this bill, DHS (border patrol) cannot stop anyone from entering... with or without a wall... if they are with a child?
Section 224(a) of the bill
“None of the funds provided by this Act or any other Act, or provided from any accounts in the Treasury of the United States derived by the collection of fees available to the components funded by this Act, may be used by the Secretary of Homeland Security to place in detention, remove, refer for a decision whether to initiate removal proceedings, or initiate removal proceedings against a sponsor, potential sponsor, or member of a household of a sponsor or potential sponsor of an unaccompanied alien child ( as defined in section 462 (g) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 279(g))) based on information shared by the Secretary of Health and Human Services.”
https://www.conservativereview.com/news/hidden-amnesty-provision-border-security-deal/
Yes you are correct.
In the mean time we will be waiting for the SC to rule. Well in 2 years Trump has yet to even have a proper ruling from the SC on his ability to control the border.
While we wait to hear from the John (I like Obamacare) Robert court), millions will just walk right in with a kid in tow, and when they learn it is not their child, we will pay to bring the true parents up.
“Am I reading this right? If PDJT signs this bill, DHS (border patrol) cannot stop anyone from entering... with or without a wall... if they are with a child?
Section 224(a) of the bill”
From what I’ve heard the DHS isn’t interpreting section 224 that way and will continue to enforce. Still, the special provisions in the national emergency act would nullify section 224 (a) in an emergency declaration, and that would remain in effect until the emergency is declared over. The military would take over apprehending and detaining the illegal invaders if needed, taking it out of the hands of the DHS.
Am I reading this right? If PDJT signs this bill, DHS (border patrol) cannot stop anyone from entering... with or without a wall... if they are with a child?
Section 224(a) of the bill
“None of the funds provided by this Act or any other Act, or provided from any accounts in the Treasury of the United States derived by the collection of fees available to the components funded by this Act, may be used by the Secretary of Homeland Security to place in detention, remove, refer for a decision whether to initiate removal proceedings, or initiate removal proceedings against a sponsor, potential sponsor, or member of a household of a sponsor or potential sponsor of an unaccompanied alien child ( as defined in section 462 (g) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 279(g))) based on information shared by the Secretary of Health and Human Services.”
https://www.conservativereview.com/news/hidden-amnesty-provision-border-security-deal/